We performed a comparison between SUSE Linux Enterprise and Ubuntu Linux based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Ubuntu Linux has an edge in this comparison. Unlike SUSE Linux Enterprise, it has a proven ROI.
"The solution offers a secure operation system."
"SUSE Linux Enterprise is scalable."
"Linux is easy to use. You have more control on a Unix system."
"The technical support services are good."
"SUSE Linux's most valuable feature is the documentation - there is a lot of documentation about how to create custom servers."
"The solution is easy to use, secure and allows for simple manipulation."
"The main feature is that Linux is flexible to work with for most web-based applications."
"The initial setup is simple and takes five minutes for deployment and if you have automation in place, it will take four minutes."
"Linux-based operating system with good stability, good patching, and a straightforward setup."
"The tool is stable. It can automate the updates like Microsoft."
"The solution has high fantastic performance."
"There are several manuals online that are free and available to help you."
"We can easily customize the NTS Client code."
"The solution is always adding more features."
"The feature that I have found the most valuable is that it is open source. It is also very easy to manage. We can manage it ourselves."
"The solution is user-friendly."
"They should improve their educational portal."
"All distributions of Linux could use some improvement."
"We have had trouble integrating Autodesk with the SUSE manager."
"The only stability issues that I can recall encountering with SUSE would be with KDE. However, that is limited to just the desktop environment as I have not had stability issues with most server functions."
"We previously had trouble integrating Autodesk with the SUSE Manager, but the issue was resolved."
"The price of SUSE Linux Enterprise could improve, it is too expensive."
"Red Hat has more packages that are available than SUSE does. I'd love to see more projects based on SUSE."
"SUSE could make more APIs available."
"Could be better support for graphic drivers and support from the hardware lenders."
"The product could be compatible with Microsoft."
"The solution could improve by allowing more integration."
"If I run an application, I need it to show up in Microsoft, so Microsoft can run in Ubuntu. It needs to connect better with Microsoft products."
"When you upgrade the core of this operating system, it can crash. This is the only problem I had. It needs more stable upgrades."
"The solution could be more user-friendly, as I use Mac on a day to day basis."
"The solution could improve by having better integration."
"The solution has a bit of a learning curve. It's not too high, however, you do need to understand the solution to deploy it and work with it effectively."
SUSE Linux Enterprise is ranked 6th in Operating Systems (OS) for Business with 26 reviews while Ubuntu Linux is ranked 2nd in Operating Systems (OS) for Business with 133 reviews. SUSE Linux Enterprise is rated 8.4, while Ubuntu Linux is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of SUSE Linux Enterprise writes "Stable product compatible with multiple cloud service providers ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubuntu Linux writes "A stable and free solution that is easy to deploy and has a user-friendly GUI". SUSE Linux Enterprise is most compared with openSUSE Leap, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), Oracle Linux, CentOS and Rocky Linux, whereas Ubuntu Linux is most compared with Rocky Linux, Oracle Linux, Windows Server, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) and CentOS. See our SUSE Linux Enterprise vs. Ubuntu Linux report.
See our list of best Operating Systems (OS) for Business vendors.
We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.