We performed a comparison between Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and Trend Vision One Endpoint Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"The price is low and quite competitive with others."
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"Impressive detection capabilities"
"I like FortiClient EMS. FortiEDR has a lot of great features like lockdown mode, remote wipes, and encryption. I can set malware outbreak policies and controls for detecting abnormalities. You can also simulate phishing attacks."
"Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"It's a stable solution with good performance."
"What I like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint is that it's very user-friendly. You do need some knowledge on how to navigate the portal, but as soon as you've gained that knowledge, navigation will no longer be an issue. I have no complaints about McAfee MVISION Endpoint. For me, the product is perfect the way it is. It's great right now, and it's doing good as it is."
"It's very stable and reliable."
"The most valuable features of McAfee MVISION Endpoint are advanced threat protection, web filtering, and removable storage devices in the DLP."
"MVISION offers decent protection."
"It's good that it periodically scans all my drives. I can stay up to date with the status of my drivers and update them if needed."
"If the network has seen something, we can use that to put a block to all the endpoints."
"FireEye Endpoint Security is easy to use and lightweight compared to others."
"The most favorable features have been behavior monitoring and zero-day threat protection."
"Technical support is quite knowledgeable and helpful."
"It is very stable. It also has good security capabilities. It is a strong security product for endpoint protection."
"Its scalability and the central point of XDR so that all items are centrally reporting to one solution are the most valuable features."
"Apex One is flexible and offers a lot of visibility on the agent."
"The initial setup was very straightforward."
"The product offers almost all of the features the client expects from such a solution."
"The most valuable feature is the vulnerability attack and detection since it enables swift action."
"We've encountered challenges during API deployment, occasionally resulting in unstable environments."
"Once, we had an event that was locked and blocked, but information about it came to us two or three days later."
"The support needs improvement."
"Intelligence aspects need improvement"
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"The solution is not stable."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"There's room for improvement in the quick response time and technical support for integration issues, especially when dealing with multiple vendors."
"Most of these types of solutions including others, such as Carbon Black and FortiEDR, all have the same features. However, Carbon Black is the leader when it comes to being robust and user-friendly and this solution should improve in those areas to stay more competitive."
"You do not have access to all the features when you use the Trellix web interface. For example, you cannot do device or drive encryption from the web interface. Also, when we're working with customers, it's sometimes challenging to get sales support. Delays mean we might lose an opportunity. Lastly, Trellix lacks some documentation about custom features."
"Looking at the current ePolicy orchestrator, and the transition of most vendors to the cloud, they need to do an improvement with the current dashboard or the overall aesthetic of their GUI."
"The solution can be expensive."
"The reports need more development. They need more details on the reports and more details taking the executive view into consideration."
"I would like to see more local integration for the applications that we use."
"McAfee MVISION Endpoint could improve by an overall simplification of the solution."
"The initial setup can be a bit complicated for those unfamiliar with the product."
"Apex One uses a lot of RAM and other physical resources, and I also don't like the web interface."
"Occasionally, the system may be a bit slow."
"All the features in Trend Micro Apex One are not compatible or functional for all the different operating systems. For example, they have fewer features in other operating systems compared to what they have for Microsoft Windows. It would be nice if they could have one solution which all functions work on all kinds of operating systems. It would be much easier for those who have different operating systems in their environment to have one solution."
"The reporting can be improved. We'd like to have had broader insights as to what was happening on a machine."
"There is room for improvement in the behavior filtering and control of Trend Micro."
"Apex One could use some updates to its UI, threat modeling, and insights. I would like to see better integration with helpdesk platforms and more AI-driven features."
"It would be great it can support endpoint encryption."
"I would like to see the initial setup simplified to make it less complicated, and the price reduced."
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is ranked 19th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 49 reviews while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is ranked 6th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 125 reviews. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is rated 7.6, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) writes "Reliable with good independent modules and a straightforward setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One Endpoint Security writes "We can get consolidated logs of suspicious objects and malware attacks in a single console". Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is most compared with Trellix Endpoint Security, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon and Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR), whereas Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is most compared with Trend Micro Deep Security, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trend Vision One and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks. See our Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
