We performed a comparison between Apache Subversion and Bitbucket based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Apache Subversion is a scalable solution."
"We have developed automation to speed up common repetitive processes."
"It is easy to write code and store it in the central repository."
"What I liked the most about this program is that it integrates seamlessly with JIRA."
"The tool's automation helped because we onboarded a lot of projects and teams into Bitbucket. The product's automation helped us complete activities in two days which previously used to take around two weeks to complete. We have completely automated processes that were earlier manual. It has good integration with Jira and Jenkins."
"The most valuable thing we have found is the workloads are good in Jira and we are able to control the access."
"BitBucket is a reliable and user-friendly product."
"The most valuable feature of Bitbucket is you can see the differences between the fresh code and the old code before you merge. Additionally, the solution is easy to use and well-integrated."
"Bitbucket lets me create new projects in a few clicks and check out files in a seamless and integrated manner."
"The planning model is good, and so is the suite of applications around it."
"Apache Subversion should be easier to use."
"The most valuable feature is CLI."
"The tool offers a limited pipeline structure."
"Bitbucket could improve search and indexing capabilities. There is only basic searching available. There is only the ability to index the main branch but not the subbranches. The search capabilities are dodgy."
"When users are given access for the first time, they should have some basic setups to help them specify their purposes."
"I rate Bitbucket five out of 10 for affordability. It isn't cheap."
"In future releases, more integration is always a valuable aspect to consider."
"I would like to see the security logs option on the tool directly. The current way to work with security logs is through an email protocol."
"I think the configuration can be improved because it is getting more complicated and not very well organized."
"Technical support is not very fast."
Apache Subversion is ranked 9th in Version Control with 4 reviews while Bitbucket is ranked 1st in Version Control with 42 reviews. Apache Subversion is rated 7.2, while Bitbucket is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Apache Subversion writes "Centralized repository, but the stability could improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Bitbucket writes "It's a good solution for storing code, but the usability and integration could be better". Apache Subversion is most compared with IBM Rational ClearCase, whereas Bitbucket is most compared with Bitbucket Server, AWS CodeCommit, GitHub, Atlassian SourceTree and IBM Rational ClearCase. See our Apache Subversion vs. Bitbucket report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.