We performed a comparison between Appian and KiSSFLOW based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The process models provide self-documenting systems."
"The initial setup was seamless. We didn't run into any hardships at all."
"The Application Designer is very user friendly. There are also lot of plug-ins that you can use and, for the most part, they are free."
"Even with an on-premise implementation, the scalability is still high, so it is easy to scale up."
"It's heavy on business processing in terms of logic, process workflows, and primarily on the process design modeler. Appian is really great at that. In terms of the full stack set from a low-code platform perspective, it's definitely an eye opener since it can be deployed via mobile app and on the web as well."
"Since implementing we have had a faster time to solution, with fewer resources needed."
"The most valuable features are the low coding and low code data."
"Process Modeling enables creation of business process workflows. You can create complex business workflows in a visual manner, and it is also easy to debug/monitor."
"The best thing is the no-code part. Even a person without experience with the coding language can easily understand and build the processes."
"Kissflow has reduced the bottleneck around getting approval for certain items in the company."
"The best thing about KiSSFLOW is that we can do virtual approvals."
"The flexibility and speed in modifying and creating processes are great features. If we have a process in mind, we can usually create it within ten minutes."
"The most valuable feature is the performance."
"Kissflow is intuitive and easy to use, and I haven't faced any errors using the solution so far."
"The user interface is very, very good."
"I like the forms which help us to get information."
"The biggest areas of improvement would be in facilitating team development, DevOps, and integration with typical tools used in enterprise development (Jenkins, Subversion, etc.)"
"If that had more DevOps capabilities, it would be an excellent product."
"I wouldn't say their response time is long, but it could be quicker."
"There should be more flexibility for the developers to choose the look and feel of the UI. They should have a better ability to design their widgets and customize them with different colors, shapes, and sizes. That is a limitation that could be improved upon."
"The performance is pretty good, but the distortions need to be optimized in order for it to work well."
"Lacks integration with other products."
"There are some restrictions with respect to using external components within Appian. So, for example, if we do not have a particular feature available, there's a long cycle of getting approvals and all of that. That does not offer flexibility, which definitely can be improved on."
"The solution needs more features. For example, a way to connect to our viewing database, to record, and more interface and component design."
"They should increase their marketplace with existing tools so that connections are directly through connectors instead of API integrations."
"Sometimes some notifications don't appear on the mobile app."
"The integration between forms should be made easier."
"If Kissflow can help users to be able to organize the company manuals and information, the blogs, and everything into one resource, that would be awesome."
"The UI, though is pretty friendly and easy to use, can be improved in some aspects."
"There is room for improvement in terms of stability."
"KiSSFLOW needs to improve its integration."
"There is a lag in the delay between API calls."
Appian is ranked 4th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 58 reviews while KiSSFLOW is ranked 10th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews. Appian is rated 8.4, while KiSSFLOW is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of KiSSFLOW writes "The tool is intuitive to use and, through automation, has been a real time-saver". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Camunda, ServiceNow, OutSystems and Pega BPM, whereas KiSSFLOW is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, ServiceNow, Camunda, Nintex Process Platform and Bizagi. See our Appian vs. KiSSFLOW report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors, best Rapid Application Development Software vendors, and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.