We performed a comparison between AppWorx Workload Automation and OpCon based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: AppWorx Workload Automation is highly regarded for its ease of use and consistent performance. Users appreciate its intuitive interface and reliable functionality. OpCon stands out for its adaptability and ability to seamlessly integrate with other systems. Users also appreciate its self-service capabilities and the added value of automating manual tasks, resulting in fewer mistakes and improved efficiency.
Users of AppWorx Workload Automation are looking for improvements in API integration and better integration with other tools. They also mention that scalability could be enhanced. OpCon users desire improved functionality in the web-based interface and mention compatibility issues with upgrades. They would also like to have a mobile app for easier accessibility and improvements in self-service functionality. OpCon users mention limitations in APIs and interfaces of other systems, concerns about pricing, and the need for better training and cross-training.
Service and Support: Customers have highly rated AppWorx Workload Automation for its excellent customer service and support, specifically praising its technical support. OpCon's customer service is also highly regarded, described as great, timely, and helpful, focused on finding solutions. However, there have been cases where customers felt the solutions provided were not applicable.
Ease of Deployment: The setup process for AppWorx Workload Automation is straightforward, although it may seem intricate to individuals unfamiliar with the system. Administrator access and involvement are necessary. OpCon's setup can be complicated, however, with the assistance of SMA consultants, it becomes more manageable.
Pricing: AppWorx Workload Automation has a costly setup due to the requirement of multiple orchestrated systems. OpCon offers a tiered pricing model and tailored licensing based on usage, making it a more affordable option. Customers find OpCon competitively priced and worth considering for those focused on cost.
ROI: OpCon is a highly efficient and cost-effective automation solution that provides substantial advantages. It streamlines tasks, minimizes time consumption, decreases mistakes, and eliminates the necessity for dedicated operators. AppWorx does not have any ROI details from users.
Comparison Results: OpCon is the preferred choice over AppWorx Workload Automation due to its flexibility, integration capabilities, and self-service features. Users can automate tasks according to their specific needs, reducing complexity and increasing productivity. The graphical user interface and database functionality are also praised.
"It has improved my organization through automation of back office and infrastructure procedures, and by integrating and orchestrating key business applications spanning multiple technology stacks."
"The solution is very user friendly so anyone can use it."
"The most valuable features of AppWorx Workload Automation are simplicity and reliability. Additionally, they recently transformed the UI which is better."
"It is really a robust product."
"Scheduling is a good feature."
"The interface is good."
"The automated solution is the most valuable piece. Otherwise, we would have to be doing everything manually on every server."
"It is an object-based approach to task and process design in conjunction with conditional logic and event-based scheduling actions, which enables a build once/use often design methodology to be employed."
"Since we got it configured, it has just done the job day in, day out. Being able to rely on it and know that it's going to happen, whether there's a person over it or not, is really good."
"For us, the most valuable feature of the solution is the file transfer piece and being able to automate the moving of files around between our various vendors. It reduces the time involved versus somebody having to individually move the files around."
"The most valuable feature is the self-service because it has made it possible to provide simple and quick solutions in the handling of certain tasks."
"The most valuable feature is being able to schedule tasks so that they reliably occur each day, each week, each month, or sometimes several times a day... The scheduler works as it should."
"The most valuable feature is the automation in general."
"It can run scripted tasks automatically over and over without intervention. That is what it does and the part that I really like because repetitive tasks need to be done over and over, day after day, no matter what day of the week it is. It is difficult to have staff do these manually and consistently, especially over weekends or through the night. Instead, you can have OpCon do them."
"The image scanning and anti-malware features are really valuable."
"The ability to chain jobs together allows us to create complex interdependencies between our jobs, and the integration into our core system is important because it allows us, through an automated system, to do a huge number of things that used to be done manually."
"The graphical interface is pretty cool but not the best so it could use some improvement."
"It is not really scaling per say because they are not putting much into it. They are trying to push their new product."
"The scalability could improve."
"It is difficult to integrate with the Active Directory (AD)."
"We are looking for additional features that would allow us to call APIs and integrate the product with other tools more effectively."
"Reporting, forecasting and intelligence could be improved."
"The compliance features are limited to the server and not the entire infrastructure."
"The internal security model can be complex when configuring multiple user groups."
"We would like a display of the created date, created by, and last modified date, as well as modified by."
"The products are extremely powerful and capable. Anytime you have such capability, the programming/configuration that goes into making it work can be complicated."
"What can get complicated is if you're doing anything more than just the built-in jobs. If you're using the more advanced features, troubleshooting becomes extremely complicated."
"I don't really think anything needs to be improved within the functionality. The only struggle I had, when I first started using it, is that it depends a lot on the command line and I didn't have that experience. So more built-in, basic commands or more education on commands would be good."
"I would like to see them improve the Solution Manager for the web application. It's the future for us. Our customers need a lot of functionality, but there isn't that functionality within Solution Manager. So they have to develop and improve it."
"Enterprise Manager is a little clunky which I know they're addressing in the solution's manager."
"It was hard to automate in the beginning because there were a lot of concepts. I had to learn a lot of things, as I never used such a software before. I learned a lot of the concepts and ideas behind it in the beginning."
"The ability to retrieve information from logs in variables to display relevant information would be helpful."
AppWorx Workload Automation is ranked 17th in Workload Automation with 7 reviews while OpCon is ranked 9th in Workload Automation with 56 reviews. AppWorx Workload Automation is rated 8.0, while OpCon is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of AppWorx Workload Automation writes "The scheduling tool and finance module are valuable features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpCon writes "Gives us the ability to schedule dependent jobs across different mainframes". AppWorx Workload Automation is most compared with Automic Workload Automation, Control-M, AutoSys Workload Automation and Automic Automation Intelligence, whereas OpCon is most compared with Control-M, AutoSys Workload Automation, Automic Workload Automation, IBM Workload Automation and UiPath. See our AppWorx Workload Automation vs. OpCon report.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Hello Rick, I couldn't help you with the Appwork applications manager.
On the other hand, one thing that is certain that
we are satisfied to have migrated all our jobs processing under OpCon (120 000
jobs/days) since 2018.
We have improved in terms
of service quality, we have made progress in the automation of our business
process and we benefit from more functionalities and reduces operating costs.
OpCon is a true
Enterprise Scheduler.
I hope this will help you in your
research.
Ian,
It isn't that AWA wont work. It comes down to support from another vendor. The vendor isn't currently familiar with AWA, so they are taking classes, and will be able to support it in the future
We are about to start to use AWA and was wondering why that platform will not work for you going forward?
@NickWilcox you recently reviewed OpCon - would you be willing to share your experiences with @Rick Murray to help him with his decision? @reviewer1166826 maybe you can give some insight into the pros and cons of AppWorx?
I am sorry because cannot help you. We have no experience with Appworx Application Manager.