We performed a comparison between ARIS BPA and Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Design solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of ARIS BPA are the centralized repository and the automatic rendering of diagrams."
"Aris BPA has a lot of tools that are more professional than Bizagi."
"The capability to integrate all information of the business and to generate simulations of processes. It can analyze the model of operations quickly."
"The solution is user-friendly and easy to expose."
"Visualizes processes which helps the business see pain points."
"The most valuable features of ARIS BPA are its flexibility and reporting."
"The stability of the ARIS BPM platform is quite good. The nice thing about it is the central database, where we can use all of our data. We can even manage users."
"There is a really powerful reporting API that allows you to create almost any kind of report you want out of your process and document repository."
"One notable software-related benefit from a user perspective is our improved ability to identify opportunities for automation and process enhancement just by gaining a clearer view of the processes. There are two valuable aspects. First, setting up the process architecture is commendable. Second, not having to maintain different versions of processes is a notable benefit. The solution is stable. The support team is responsive."
"The most valuable feature is the integrated manner in which all the capabilities of the Enterprise Process Center platform work together and make it easier to complete the documentation of processes."
More Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center Pros →
"The usability. Others tools are easier to manage without same complexity that ARIS has."
"The tool needs to improve its support since they take long to respond."
"I use it strictly for developing the business process model. I don't use it for the actual automation. I do that with Vtenext. I have standardized on Vtenext, and I don't use ARIS BPM anymore. The Vtenext UI is just as good, and it is much more tightly coupled to the underlying object model. I can get more done in one session with Vtenext rather than first going to ARIS BPM, then importing, and having to edit it for tight coupling."
"In terms of improvement, the app could use some small details and functionalities."
"I believe the solutions BPM tools are not very good and need improvements."
"The standard out-of-the-box solutions for modeling are not so good. You have to do some configuration to make it easier and more user-friendly."
"We should have the ability to download ARIS EPCs to Visio."
"The solution's processes are huge and it is not easy to get an overview of how things work. It needs to improve the interface. I would like to see the product include a better overview of processes and improve search."
"As with all such platforms, Enterprise Process Center is a complex tool and there are many capabilities and features that take time to learn."
"However, on the process mining side, there's potential for improvement to gain deeper insights into process functionality. Additionally, there's always room for enhancement in the user interface."
More Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center Cons →
More Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center Pricing and Cost Advice →
ARIS BPA is ranked 3rd in Business Process Design with 64 reviews while Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center is ranked 20th in Business Process Design with 2 reviews. ARIS BPA is rated 8.4, while Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of ARIS BPA writes "I can usually find an answer to my issue on ARIS Community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center writes "Highly integrated, user-friendly, and supports mobile devices". ARIS BPA is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, ADONIS, Camunda, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Bizagi, whereas Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center is most compared with . See our ARIS BPA vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center report.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.