We performed a comparison between Aruba Networks Wireless WAN and Cambium Networks Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."All the features are available, even including the security. The access point enables the matching of any connectivity."
"The initial setup of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN can be done quickly, and everything functions smoothly."
"I have found the technical support to be one of the most valuable features."
"I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable feature is reliability."
"The product gives good stability and concurrency."
"It works well. It is reliable."
"The most valuable features are price, quality, and performance."
"It excels in challenging environments and adverse weather conditions, maintaining high performance without any impact on the link quality."
"The most valuable features for network performance in the solution are reliability and centralized management through a single controller."
"The most valuable features of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN are cloud management and links."
"It's a good product and works well when there is a lot of interference."
"It is a stable solution."
"Technical support has been good."
"The initial setup is easy to handle. It's quite simple."
"It is easy to deploy and has many specialists to help us handle complicated processes."
"Deployment can take some time if you haven't planned well."
"We have had stability issues with some types of portable devices."
"Sometimes, the configuration part of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN can be complex, and if you fail to understand the product at once, you may not even know about some features that you can apply to your network, and they may go unused."
"The internet signal and the connection can be better."
"The initial setup has a lot of options, which makes it very versatile yet very complicated to install. There should be two modes: a basic mode and then a more advanced mode to help make implementation easier. Most of the time, if it's a small installation, you don't need the complexity. You shouldn't need higher expertise in order to install a couple of access points in a single place."
"It is a little bit cumbersome to configure. If you're designing a WLAN and you want to do and cover certain types of clients, you really have to know different settings and how they interact with one another. If they could automate that so that if you are designing for one type of equipment, you could, in essence, run a wizard. That would certainly save on a lot of calls to tech support."
"The customization options could be improved."
"This solution needs different models that are more specialized for certain customers."
"The product could have more access points to increase the network coverage."
"There is no good technical support available for Cambium Networks Wireless WAN."
"Pricing tends to be higher than its competitors."
"The Wifi coverage and throughput performance of Cambium could improve."
"The Cambium user interface and configuration should be improved."
"Cambium's solution is flexible for various connectivity needs, although there are limitations based on the specific equipment and metrics. The indoor coverage typically reaches up to sixty meters and may require external antennas for optimal performance and for outdoor connectivity, Cambium Networks offer excellent scalability and coverage, especially with sectorial access points."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN could improve by providing a better signal range."
"The solution needs to add an LTE solution and/or something in 3.5GHz."
More Cambium Networks Wireless WAN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 5th in Wireless WAN with 47 reviews while Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 3rd in Wireless WAN with 24 reviews. Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.4, while Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN writes "It's reliable, cost-effective, and easy to troubleshoot". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN writes "Provides point-to-point and point-to-multipoint connectivity and user-friendly solution". Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless, Fortinet FortiWLM and Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, whereas Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless, Ruckus Wireless WAN and Cisco Wireless WAN. See our Aruba Networks Wireless WAN vs. Cambium Networks Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.