We performed a comparison between Cambium Networks Wireless WAN and Ruckus Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a good product for cloud management."
"The solution's coverage range is good, it is easy to use, and deployment is very easy and user-friendly."
"The most valuable features of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN are cloud management and links."
"The initial setup is easy to handle. It's quite simple."
"It's a good product and works well when there is a lot of interference."
"The product's scalability features are good."
"The performance is very good."
"Technical support has been good."
"The analytic solution is good and should be improving further."
"It's highly scalable as long as the licenses are in place. You can expand it easily."
"Provides great coverage and performance."
"One of its notable advantages lies in the superior performance of its antennas and radios."
"Its build quality is good and quite robust."
"We found the technical support to be helpful."
"One of the standout features is the ease of installation and commissioning, making the whole process very straightforward."
"The deployment access in the local system is about 200 access points. External access points is more. The number is huge. There about 1,000 users in total."
"The solution's price could be better."
"It has voucher generation. These vouchers are provided to the customers. It would be great if there is a possibility to integrate these vouchers with the system that vendors use to print the receipts. For example, if you go to Starbucks, they provide you a receipt, and in that receipt, you have the code for the Wi-Fi network. I would like some kind of integration or API that can be integrated into any other system for generating such receipts. It would be a really nice feature. It has the cnMaestro portal that normally an integrator sets up. When you deploy this solution to a user, rather than generating a Cambium account, I would like to share this console with the users so that they can at least see the stability of the network and not necessarily trust what I said. It also allows the customers in visualizing the way that they are connecting and the way the network is behaving. I have been in touch with the Cambium team for these features, but they don't yet have the final answer. It is kind of hard to get these solutions immediately. It is a bit challenging to bring these devices to Lima, Peru, or to get Cambium from the distributors. They need to import these devices."
"One drawback is that Cambium's on-premises controller needs internet connectivity for installation, which can be a problem for clients who want it offline."
"The product could have more access points to increase the network coverage."
"The installation and configuration are a bit complex."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is stable but sometimes the 2.4 gigahertz network is sometimes not as stable as the 5 gigahertz. The 5 gigahertz works smoothly with everything, but 2.4 has some problems. If we change the configuration I am not sure if it would fix the problem."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN could improve by providing a better signal range."
"The Cambium user interface and configuration should be improved."
"Ruckus Wireless WAN we have a lot of component shortages in the world. This has impacted deliveries. We have large back orders of the solution."
"I would not consider this solution to be stable."
"In comparison to Cambium, I find Cambium to be more robust in terms of performance."
"They could include a firewall feature in the next release but even there it's not really necessary"
"We have one sole distributor here in our region. To have multiple distributors here would be very helpful to improve the supply chain."
"The captive portal should be more customizable because right now, it is very limited."
"The solution's AI offering and pricing could be improved."
"The pricing needs to be reconsidered because it's expensive."
More Cambium Networks Wireless WAN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 3rd in Wireless WAN with 24 reviews while Ruckus Wireless WAN is ranked 2nd in Wireless WAN with 45 reviews. Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.6, while Ruckus Wireless WAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN writes "Provides point-to-point and point-to-multipoint connectivity and user-friendly solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ruckus Wireless WAN writes " Offers robust outdoor connectivity, but signal strength and support need improvement". Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless, Cisco Wireless WAN and Aruba Networks Wireless WAN, whereas Ruckus Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless. See our Cambium Networks Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.