We performed a comparison between GuardDuty and Trend Micro Cloud One based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: AWS GuardDuty is highly regarded for its extensive monitoring capabilities, threat detection, and ability to analyze various log sources. Trend Micro Cloud One is highly praised for its vulnerability scanning and ability to provide visibility into critical events. Users have suggested that AWS GuardDuty could improve by adding a mobile version and more dashboard analytics. Reviewers feel that Trend Micro Cloud One should enhance automation, simplify deployment, and offer more competitive pricing.
Service and Support: AWS GuardDuty customers are satisfied with the swift and helpful support they've received from the Amazon team. Cloud One users commended Trend Micro's support team for their extensive knowledge and expertise.
Ease of Deployment: AWS GuardDuty users described the initial as simple and quick. Some Trend Micro Cloud One users said the setup was easy, but others noted that it may pose a challenge for less experienced users.
Pricing: AWS GuardDuty offers a pay-go license, with different pricing tiers based on usage levels. There are no extra costs apart from the standard licensing. Reviewers say Trend Micro Cloud One isn't expensive per se, but the license could be more competitive. Trend Micro offers monthly, quarterly, or annual payment options. Additional services can be purchased at an added cost.
ROI: AWS GuardDuty improves security and builds customer confidence, helping businesses expand. Trend Micro Cloud One provides a versatile return on investment by offering effortless integration and cancellation options, and users have not reported any negative encounters.
Comparison Results: User reviews indicate that AWS GuardDuty is preferred over Trend Micro Cloud One. Reviewers liked GuardDuty's comprehensive monitoring capabilities and advanced threat response. Users find the setup process for GuardDuty to be simple and straightforward, whereas some users reported difficulties with Cloud One. GuardDuty also earned high marks for its reasonable pricing, but users say Trend Micro could lower the price of Cloud One to match competitors.
"PingSafe can integrate all your cloud accounts and resources you create in the AWS account, We have set it up to scan the AWS transfer services, EC2, security groups, and GitHub."
"PingSafe offers three key features: vulnerability management notifications, cloud configuration assistance, and security scanning."
"The agentless vulnerability scanning is great."
"The solution helped free other staff to work on other projects or other tasks. We basically just had to do a bunch of upfront configuring. With it, we do not have to spend as much time in the console."
"The offensive security where they do a fix is valuable. They go to a misconfiguration and provide detailed alerts on what could be there. They also provide a remediation feature where if we give the permission, they can also go and fix the issue."
"The most valuable feature of PingSafe is its integration with most of our technology stack, specifically all of our cloud platforms and ticketing software."
"We noted immediate benefits from using the solution."
"It is scalable, stable, and can detect any threat on a machine. It uses artificial intelligence and can lock down any virus."
"AWS GuardDuty helps by providing continuous threat detection and signaling potential threats. Its most valuable feature is continuous monitoring. The tool's integration with other AWS services has improved security. It provides continuous monitoring and intelligent threat detection, quickly signaling any issues. I would rate this improvement a seven out of ten."
"The product has automated protection powered by AI/ML, which is now far more powerful than before. It uses AI/ML in its detection algorithm, providing fast and quick results."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The correlation back end is the solution's most valuable feature."
"It helps us detect brute-force attacks based on machine learning."
"We use the tool for threat detection. AWS includes AI features as well. AWS GuardDuty gives us reports."
"We have over 1,000 employees, and we monitor their activity through AWS GuardDuty."
"It kinda just gives us another layer of security. So it does provide some sort of comfort that we do have something that is monitoring for abnormal behavior."
"The security is good."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's best features are security analysis, remote access security, and driver security."
"The storage and computing features are valuable."
"The perfect package for all security platforms, providing more than any other endpoint solution."
"The product helps us understand our environment better."
"I really like Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's dashboard."
"Vision One is versatile and can be integrated with many SIEMs. You're not limited to only one SIEM, such as Microsoft Sentinel. The API integrations are seamless, and we have all the documentation needed to integrate Vision One via API."
"The most valuable part of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is its dashboard, as it's simple. It's easy to manage, and you can better control the solution."
"Bugs need to be disclosed quickly."
"We recently adopted a new ticket management solution, so we've asked them to include a connector to integrate that tool with Cloud Native Security directly. We'd also like to see Cloud Native Security add a scan for personally identifying information. We're looking at other tools for this capability, but having that functionality built into Cloud Native Security would be nice. Monitoring PII data is critical to us as an organization."
"Customized queries should be made easier to improve PingSafe."
"PingSafe is an excellent CSPM tool, but the CWPP features need to improve, and there is a scope for more application security posture management features. There aren't many ASPM solutions on the market, and existing ones are costly. I would like to see PingSafe develop into a single pane of glass for ASPM, CSPM, and CWPP. Another feature I'd like to see is runtime protection."
"The resolution suggestions could be better, and the compliance features could be more customizable for Indian regulations. Overall, the compliance aspects are good. It gives us a comprehensive list, and its feedback is enough to bring us into compliance with regulations, but it doesn't give us the specific objects."
"Their search feature could be better."
"The cost has the potential for improvement."
"We wanted it to provide us with something like Claroty Hub in AWS for lateral movement. For example, if an EC2 instance or a virtual machine is compromised in a public subnet based on a particular vulnerability, such as Log4j, we want it to not be able to reach some of our databases. This kind of feature is not supported in PingSafe."
"It would be great if the solution had some automation capabilities."
"While sending the alerts to the email, they are not being patched. we have to do the patching and mapping manually. If GuardDuty could include a feature to do this automatically, it will make our job easier. That is something I believe can be improved."
"Cost changes. It's very expensive. If you turn on every feature, it's more than most commercial vendors. For smaller orgs, that doesn't make sense."
"One improvement I would suggest for AWS GuardDuty is the ability to assign findings to specific users or groups, facilitating better communication and follow-up actions."
"AWS GuardDuty needs to be more customer-oriented."
"It is evolving, and at the moment, I will just need it on a larger scale. Then, it will satisfy my demand, initially."
"Amazon GuardDuty could be better enriched in threat intelligence data."
"The product needs to improve its cost-efficiency since it is expensive."
"Documentation on cloud architecture and job architecture would be helpful."
"The local agent should be able to show more logs. At present, the logs are only available from the web console and not from the local agent."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security should address threats automatically without having user input."
"There are also some loopholes because it's a new product that they have recently migrated to the cloud. We do see some issues with the policies we have assigned when it comes to a particular account. There are some issues with system support, such as a particular server kernel version that is not supported."
"One area for improvement in Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is marketing; in particular, Trend Vision should update the marketing documentation. The information needs to be more comprehensive."
"The firewall configuration should have been automated based on the understanding of the application, utilities, and protocols."
"The product could use a little bit of automation."
"The dashboard should be a bit more intuitive."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
AWS GuardDuty is ranked 4th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 20 reviews while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 7th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 17 reviews. AWS GuardDuty is rated 8.2, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of AWS GuardDuty writes "A stellar threat-detection service that has helped bolster security against malicious threats". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". AWS GuardDuty is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Wiz and Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, whereas Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, AWS Security Hub and Orca Security. See our AWS GuardDuty vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
