We performed a comparison between Bitdefender GravityZone EDR and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Bitdefender GravityZone EDR offers comprehensive detection capabilities and an advanced management interface. It is known for its easy setup, scalability, and reasonable pricing. Meanwhile, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint excels in file protection, encryption, and ransomware defense. It integrates seamlessly with other Microsoft security products. Users appreciate its user-friendly interface and scalability. The reviews suggest that Bitdefender GravityZone EDR can improve by adding a built-in firewall, optimizing deployment, and enhancing encryption. Users say Microsoft Defender for Endpoint should improve its central console and auto-recovery feature. Users also requested better reporting capabilities and integration with third-party platforms.
Service and Support: Opinions are divided about Bitdefender's customer service, with some users reporting prompt and helpful assistance and others experiencing responses and an overwhelming amount of emails. Microsoft customer service garnered mixed feedback. Some customers commend the fast response time and expertise of the support engineers, while others express dissatisfaction with slow replies and a lack of coordination among the support teams.
Ease of Deployment: Bitdefender GravityZone EDR's initial setup is generally considered simple and easy, taking a maximum of 20 minutes. However, it may become more complex with new updates or older computers. In contrast, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint's setup is straightforward and not difficult, especially with preloaded installation on Windows 10. While it can be more complex for larger organizations, it is generally considered simple, particularly for smaller companies or those familiar with Microsoft environments.
Pricing: Bitdefender GravityZone EDR’s licensing is considered reasonable, and contract lengths are flexible. There may be additional charges for extra features or services. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers fair pricing as it is included with Windows or Microsoft Office 365 subscriptions, without any additional licensing costs. However, some users believe that Microsoft's pricing could be more affordable and mention complexities in their licensing models.
ROI: Bitdefender GravityZone EDR offers varied ROI based on different situations, whereas Microsoft Defender for Endpoint delivers cost savings, enhanced efficiency, and heightened threat management.
Comparison Results: Our users prefer Bitdefender GravityZone EDR over Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. Bitdefender offers a comprehensive set of features, including a built-in firewall and a slick management console. The solution earns high marks for stability, scalability, and reasonable pricing. Some Microsoft Defender for Endpoint users say the solution is missing some features and needs improvements in central management. Bitdefender's customer service is also regarded as more responsive and helpful compared to Microsoft's support.
"Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"Additionally, when it comes to EDR, there are more tools available to assist with client work."
"It is very easy to set up. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, with ten being very easy to set up."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"Having all monitoring, response, tracking, and mitigation tools in one dashboard provides our analysts and SOC team with a comprehensive view at a glance."
"Exceptions are easy to create and the interface is easy to follow with a nice appearance."
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"If you detect a virus, you can isolate the PC from the network and prevent access to the internet, network and routers. Once fixed, you can give access back to the client. We have not had this functionality using other solutions."
"Great protection against malware, ransomware, and any other forms of malicious software."
"The tool alerts about lateral internet movements."
"I haven't had a problem with its stability yet. Since we deployed it, we haven't had one computer instance where we had to reimage the computer due to the virus."
"It's a very stable solution."
"It's easy to deploy."
"The most valuable feature of Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra is the ETX and ETM endpoint protection."
"One of the most valuable features is the signature updating in near real-time."
"I like that it's easy to deploy because it already comes with Windows 10. Overall, it has all the features that we need. Easy to deploy, comes with updates, and comes with Windows updates. You don't have to really manage or update the signature."
"It comes included with the Windows license."
"What I like most is the protection against phishing emails and anti-spam."
"We have just started to implement it. It is useful for protection from malware and ransomware."
"The protection that it provides is quite good."
"It can reach our applications and PC activities in the cloud."
"Ensures that I'm working with a product that gets updated regularly without me having to remember to do it. Since it's a Microsoft product, I'm confident that it requires a low use of system resources. The benefit of that being that my computer isn't constantly being drained."
"The technical support from Microsoft is very good. We are part of the Microsoft Suite, and from being part of this we have consistent news regarding Microsoft Defender for Endpoint."
"The solution is not user-friendly."
"We'd like to see more one-to-one product presentations for the distribution channels."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"They can include the automation for the realtime updates. We have a network infrastructure with remote sites. Whenever they send updates, they are not automated. We have to go into the console and push those updates. I wish it was more automated. The update file is currently around 31 MB. It could be smaller."
"We've had a lot of false positives; things incorrectly flagged that require manual configuration to allow. Even worse, after we allow a legitimate program, it sometimes gets flagged again after an update. This has caused a lot of extra work for my team."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"Intelligence aspects need improvement"
"The reporting is much too simple."
"In the future, maybe this will need to morph into AI threat intelligence."
"Occasionally websites are unnecessarily blocked due to monitoring software on those sites."
"I have not had used the EDR portion of the solution to do any custom scripting to allow further advanced operations on the endpoints. From what I understand from reading the comments on reviews is that it is not particularly flexible in this regard."
"The areas of Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and Extended Detection and Response (XDR) could benefit from improvement in terms of how problems are reported and displayed. The way the problems are presented and the information provided could be improved."
"The firewall security could be better."
"The pricing should be improved. The user interface has been improved on a yearly basis. The key issue is that they need to look at their pricing."
"The solution wasn't designed to be used in France."
"Features like device inventory continue to lack essential workstation drill-downs showing the entire device information with the least effort."
"They can improve it on the online protection front since people nowadays are moving online and working from home."
"There are alternative solutions that offer a greater range of dashboard insights when compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint."
"The second major area for improvement involves enhanced capabilities for different operating systems or platforms. That is, even though we have coverage for different operating systems or platforms such as Linux, we don't get all of the controls and enhanced capabilities that are available with Windows devices."
"I had some cases a while back and told an agent my issue. When I called the next day, I had to explain everything again to a different person, so I found it annoying to repeat myself all over."
"There is room to improve the security of the solution."
"The interface could be improved."
"Integrating this with third-party systems has some complexity involved."
More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Pricing and Cost Advice →
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is ranked 14th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 56 reviews while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is ranked 1st in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 182 reviews. Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is rated 8.6, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Bitdefender GravityZone EDR writes "High-quality threat intelligence, including encryption and mobile device protection". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint writes "Eliminates the need to look at multiple dashboards by automatically providing one XDR dashboard to show the security score of each subscription". Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is most compared with SentinelOne Singularity Complete, CrowdStrike Falcon, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and Intercept X Endpoint, whereas Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is most compared with Symantec Endpoint Security, Intercept X Endpoint, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, Trellix Endpoint Security and Fortinet FortiClient. See our Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.