We performed a comparison between BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite and VMware Workspace ONE based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, JAMF, VMware and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)."The stability of Microsoft Intune is good."
"Users can make screenshots, and devices only need the minimal version of iOS."
"Agile and easy to deploy MDM solution that covers the maximum number of policies. Stable, scalable, and with knowledgeable technical support."
"It has improve our organization through the remote management of non-domain joined devices."
"A great solution for anyone wanting a modern endpoint device management solution."
"The reporting and analytics features in Microsoft Intune have been a lifesaver."
"Configuration profiles, remediation, scripts, and auto-pilot features are very good."
"Its security is most valuable. It gives us a way to secure devices, not only those that are steady. We do have a few tablets and other devices, and it is a way for us to secure these devices and manage them. We know they're out there and what's their status. We can manage their life cycle and verify that they're updated properly."
"We were able to utilize Android for Work-Premium in BlackBerry Android devices."
"The containerization of the BlackBerry Dynamics is the most important thing for us. It allows us to keep personal and corporate data separate on a personal device. It allows us to wipe the corporate data while leaving all the personal data in place."
"The most important feature is Blackberry Work, for sure, because that is where you have email."
"The containerization of the workspace is what we have found to be the most valuable."
"Access to the emails on the go was most valuable. Having access to your emails in a secure way is one of the most important features of this solution. Blackberry ensures data security, and as a user, I can use it while on roaming or wherever I am."
"If a device is stolen, you have the power to remove all of the contents remotely. You can do this very quickly."
"It has allowed us to manage many different mobile device platforms, like Windows 10, Android, Apple, and BlackBerry 10, all through a single pane of glass."
"Every version upgrade has been straightforward."
"The location and remote management services are the most valuable."
"The product has fully automated features that help people do tasks easily."
"A very easy to use solution."
"The initial setup is easy and the deployment doesn't take too long."
"The feature with the highest rating for me is its employee management. I can also praise how versatile it is in terms of operating systems. It has good support for multiple operating systems and can easily manage them all. Not just that, but it can also support any kind of tool that can be run on all these operating systems."
"The most valuable feature is the interface with SCAP, which is the Security Content Automation Protocol."
"It seems highly stable and scalable."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the multi-platform support."
"I'd suggest adding more features for macOS in Intune. There should be more functionality for managing macOS. There should be a better capability for pushing things down on macOS. Currently, Intune is not capable of managing macOS at the same level as Windows."
"There can be more logs. I do not have any other requirements."
"I'm still playing around with it and haven't had any issues with the product yet, but support can definitely be improved."
"Reporting needs improvement."
"It's only good for a Microsoft environment."
"In an upcoming release, I would like to see some kind of analytics report."
"It just doesn't handle software updates well at all by itself. You need to be a scripting wizard to make those happen properly, or you use third-party tools. The Windows feature updates are very difficult to implement. I would like to see a proprietary built-in remote control tool. I know that they have Team Viewer integrated, but it is not seamless. It would be nice if they had a seamless remote desktop capability directly from the Intune console."
"There should be more focus on mobile device security and integration."
"It would be nice if there was an easier way for team members to get onboarded in regards to what they have to do on the device. There are some programs like Apple DEP and Samsung Knox. Unfortunately, with these programs, to get existing users onto them, you have to factory wipe your device. If it did not have the DEP capabilities, it would be nicer if it did not have so many steps to go through. That is our biggest complaint from team members. It has too many steps."
"The pain points for us would be the activation."
"The console needs improvement. It does not provide all the information that we are looking for as far as who has installed a certain product."
"I know for the BlackBerry Connect, our users want to see more features, such as audio and video. I know the current version doesn't have that."
"The only thing is that the UEM service is a little slow. We have a product production environment, and a test environment and both of them are a little slow. When you are using the UEM Web interface, it takes time to load."
"The newest features sometimes pop in very slowly."
"I would like more support for Google Chromebook operating system, so I could manage it."
"As far as being able to remotely wipe a device, or remove it from the console, this is not simple to do. It is not a one-click motion, as it requires several steps."
"There are some bugs that our team needs to work around. It required some API integration required because visitor integration was not there. For example, we are currently working on a tunnel issue, and VMware doesn't have this solution."
"We'd like to see a better connection to Microsoft Azure and a better connection with Check Point."
"The product's stability for certain instances needs improvement."
"The bigger vendors like VMware, Insight, and MobileIron can assign engineers to customers. You can work with them to develop the right competency to use the product."
"I tried to use the tool on an encrypted disk, but it was inconvenient."
"The setup was very difficult. It was not as easy as I had expected."
"From an identity perspective, there is a lot of room for improvement when it comes to integration with other solutions. I would say it needs more capabilities in terms of direct integrations, including cloud identity solution integrations."
"One thing VMware needs to improve is compatibility with different operating systems."
More BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite Pricing and Cost Advice →
BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite is ranked 17th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 24 reviews while VMware Workspace ONE is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 82 reviews. BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite is rated 7.8, while VMware Workspace ONE is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite writes "Helpful technical support, and performs well, but initial setup could be simplified". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Workspace ONE writes "The solution is stable, scalable, and offers single sign-on". BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite is most compared with SOTI MobiControl and Ivanti Neurons for MDM, whereas VMware Workspace ONE is most compared with VMware Horizon, Jamf Pro, SOTI MobiControl, ManageEngine Endpoint Central and Scalefusion.
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.