We performed a comparison between Box and Oracle Content Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a very user-friendly product."
"The ability to collaborate around data anywhere, anytime is the most powerful features of Box."
"The application is very light in terms of uploading and downloading files."
"The system's performance is impressive, and file sharing is notably straightforward."
"File sharing with collaborators not on the same domain with offline access from multiple devices: I work on many projects that are multi-organizational, such as with customers, suppliers, or acquisitions."
"Simple file sharing and sync for internal and external customers."
"Box is extremely stable, they have not been hacked or lost any data in the past seventeen years. I am very impressed with it."
"It is really easy to load files to and from this solution."
"It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework."
"If you want to delete something in Box, you have to do it manually, one by one. That was my recent experience. They might have a bulk delete, but I could not find that option. If you want to delete something, you have to go to each and every file and delete it."
"Improvements in speed - Box's high level of security impacts performance, especially when compared with other similar services."
"Data privacy, regarding where to store your data: Offering several transparent(!) options (where to store my data and whether to sync back or not and where to sync) regarding the local law situations (USA, EU, Switzerland!) would increase the credibility of a US based company (after NSA ‘snooping’)."
"Better integration with other solutions is needed."
"I find their API to be quite complex and it could be more straightforward."
"Tasks and comments could be easier to see, report, search, and manage."
"The room for improvement is in the area of integrations. They need to establish more integrations, especially with Office 365 and Outlook."
"The UI should be faster. Sometimes it lags when switching between documents."
"Oracle Content Management poses complexities in initial implementation and configuration."
Box is ranked 4th in Enterprise Content Management with 39 reviews while Oracle Content Management is ranked 11th in Enterprise Content Management with 2 reviews. Box is rated 8.4, while Oracle Content Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Box writes "Allows you to upload and download files quickly but lacks integration with Office 365". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Content Management writes "Streamlines document management and enhances collaboration through its robust features and intuitive interface". Box is most compared with SharePoint, Microsoft OneDrive, Citrix ShareFile, Office 365 and Egnyte, whereas Oracle Content Management is most compared with Oracle WebCenter, SharePoint, Adobe Experience Manager, Microsoft OneDrive and Alfresco. See our Box vs. Oracle Content Management report.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors and best Document Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
