We performed a comparison between BrowserStack and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like that it offers full device capability."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The product's initial setup phase was not very difficult."
"The most valuable feature is that it provides parallel and cross-browser testing. It enables us to run tests on multiple browsers or devices simultaneously."
"The integration is very good."
"BrowserStack's best feature is browser testing across different platforms, including mobile."
"The main core concept behind this product is, it takes the overhead of maintaining all of your devices or particular computers. It continuously adds the latest devices that are coming into the market."
"The product guides and resources are extensive and very helpful."
"Its initial setup process is easy."
"It is a good and user-friendly tool."
"It's great for the development of .NET."
"The solution is very useful for compiling existing projects and developing new projects."
"The setup is easy and straightforward."
"The most valuable feature of Visual Studio Test Professional is its ease of use."
"The most valuable features are the SSIS reports, the deployment models, and the ability to interact with other Microsoft tools."
"The documentation is easy, and it helps us solve our problems."
"We are having difficulty with the payment system for the BrowserStack team, as they only accept credit cards and we are encountering some issues."
"BrowserStack should work on its Internet connectivity although issues only occur occasionally."
"Customer support could be better. We tried to implement and explore this product with the vendor or reseller's help, but we haven't had any good response about the product."
"Sometimes BrowserStack is really slow and devices are not loading. it is really annoying and that's why we bought several newer devices because sometimes it's affecting us a lot."
"One of the biggest issues with BrowserStack is that if you don't have your network set up by the book, it's hard to get it to work with local desk machines."
"BrowserStack is scalable, but cost is significant for those living in Mexico."
"There is some stability issue in the product, making it in areas where improvements are required."
"It is difficult to use for someone who has little to no experience."
"The price could be improved."
"It would be great to support other languages and applications, and that is one of the things we can improve."
"I would appreciate some enhancements in the interface, maybe adding more color options."
"In Visual Studio we still don't have anything which can pinpoint memory leaks on a certain code line."
"Over the years, I haven't identified any specific enhancements that I desire; Visual Studio has consistently met my requirements seamlessly and flawlessly."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"The data flow can be improved."
"It could be available for multiple platforms and other operating systems like Mac with a native port."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
BrowserStack is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 25 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 48 reviews. BrowserStack is rated 8.0, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of BrowserStack writes "Good in the area of automation and offers a high test coverage to users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". BrowserStack is most compared with LambdaTest, Sauce Labs, Perfecto, Tricentis Tosca and CrossBrowserTesting, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and Tricentis Tosca. See our BrowserStack vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.