We performed a comparison between Camunda and Nintex Process Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Provides an easy way to integrate with the architectural environment."
"Camunda is a scalable product."
"There's this graphic that tells you how many lines or how many tickets are in each step. In that way, you know where you stand. I find this feature very valuable."
"It is very user-friendly compared to IBM BPM. It's much simpler – it's more streamlined. That means even non-technical departments can use it."
"Overall, the solution has been very solid."
"The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable."
"The product has a good task management engine."
"We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users."
"Allows us to provide desktop/laptop and mobile solutions to our users."
"The solution helped us automate several processes we used to do manually."
"It has integration with BI and Analytics tools, and RPA toolsets as well."
"I think the initial setup is fine."
"It is very easy to create and deploy. I am very happy with how user-friendly Nintex Workflow is."
"I think that it adds value to any organization, mainly in terms of business applications where you need workflows."
"It has a lot of features for creating and managing workflows, as well as for integrating with other applications. Nintex offers features, particularly to ensure a user-friendly experience."
"The SharePoint feature is a really good connection, there are many features that are good."
"Camunda Platform's customer support could be improved because their response is quite slow."
"It would be better if the tool were made less reliant on Java."
"I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them."
"There should be a multi-tenant solution for the platform where it supports multiple organizations on one platform instead of having to spin up multiple clusters for each organization. There should be an easy way to integrate different departments into one platform without having to operate multiple platforms. The operations should be easier with the enterprise solution. It should not create more overhead for the operations people."
"We have faced problems with the performance."
"They could provide more documentation regarding the integration of different programming languages."
"Process interfaces between diagrams could be improved."
"It's costly and not accessible for small enterprises or startups. It would be great if Camunda offered a tier plan for smaller companies."
"There have been some glitches, and the workflow fails frequently."
"We would like to have access to an on-premises solution. In our country, we have a relationship with Central Bank of Egypt, which do noes not allow cloud solutions to be used. They should offer an on-prem solution with a flexible price license."
"I think it was lacking a little bit in its multiple in-house processes and other processes. So there is a little bit of a gap in collaboration."
"At times, issues arise in certain scenarios. In such cases, the versioning can become quite difficult. There may be no other way but to restart the entire process or rectify it at that point."
"Difficult to include external partners with the solution deployed on-premise."
"Currently, it's taking quite some time to deploy a package, it needs improvement"
"Nintex is still at the starting point of integrating with AI. It has integrated with a very small piece of artificial intelligence., like only integrated with the Google Cloud. There is a benefit, like a no-code and low-code solution. But, again, if you are a developer, especially if you are a hardcore developer, you are using your code knowledge, its skills, and all. And, suddenly, you are moving into the low-code solution, and then you will feel, like, so many things you can't achieve with the low-code solution."
"The license pricing is too high currently for Nintex Workflow."
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 71 reviews while Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Visio, whereas Nintex Process Platform is most compared with IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM, Bizagi and SAP Signavio Process Manager. See our Camunda vs. Nintex Process Platform report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
