We performed a comparison between Nintex Process Platform and Pega BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution offers very good integration capabilities. We've never had issues integrating it without solutions."
"It's easy to learn. However, there is very little content available for the Nintex also, but they are providing their own documentation and all. So, it's easy to learn also."
"The Vizio-style designer that runs in the browser is, to me, by far the most valuable feature of the solution. It means that the customer doesn’t have to install any client tools to create powerful workflows."
"We were able to meet all of the requirements for functionality that were specified, and we did not experience challenges where we had to compromise on functionality."
"The most valuable features of this solution are that it's no code, it's very flexible, and it's easy to design."
"I find it useful to utilize LDAP query action to find out the status of a particular user."
"It is a scalable product."
"Allows us to provide desktop/laptop and mobile solutions to our users."
"The user interface and the ease of developing the workflow for an application are valuable features."
"The most valuable feature of Pega BPMI would be the academy courses, specifically the Product Development Network (PDN). Additionally, our organization has a dedicated Customer Engagement Team that we work closely with to achieve our goals."
"Pricing is a little on the high side."
"The most valuable feature of Pega BPM is step-by-step voice guidance that converts your problem statement into different diagrams and then implements the process."
"The most valuable features of the solution are case management, routing, and low-code environment."
"The ability to define processes, build reports, and get insights or analytics on data is most valuable. It is a powerful platform."
"Fast prototyping."
"The case management functionality of this solution has been most valuable."
"User interface could use some improvement. Perhaps integration with Visual Studio or SharePoint Designer would be useful."
"Nintex seems to be very server intensive. It is one of the reasons that we are moving to a different product on the SharePoint 2016 platform."
"It is very flexible because you can design your own main forms, but if there were some templates according to your market, it would be more useful for a new customer. That would make K2 more user friendly and easier to use."
"We'd like to have integration with SharePoint."
"Currently, copying workflow actions from one workflow to another is not possible. Also, the Office 365 solution is not as mature as on-premise."
"Converting a document from PDF to MS Word, or vice versa, needs to be improved."
"The cost of the solution is high and has room for improvement."
"K2 is a workflow solution, and there is no RPA solution with K2. This is where K2 lacks a little bit. It is just a heavy workflow solution. It doesn't have a supplemental product like RPA. If you want to use RPA, you have to use Blue Prism, UIPath, or something else. If you use Nintex, it has an RPA solution. It is a form-based application, and they are doing everything electronically. The initial investment in K2 is heavy because it is a BPM software. It does not have a low cost because they charge you the same for one workflow or 100 workflows."
"The solution's pricing model or licensing model could be a little better."
"If it could also be integrated with robotics, it could help with a lot of things, even if we don't have APIs, we could still talk to other applications. If it could invoke a bot, for example."
"The workflow automation can be slow, so there is room for improvement there."
"Lack of stronger cloud support is somewhat inconvenient for users and implementation."
"Sometimes when we are patching some data from the database, we are getting added as a timeout."
"This is an expensive solution."
"I think there is room for improvement in the low code/ no code environment that they're promoting now. That needs to be aligned a little bit more. I still feel that it is not that friendly for a person who has no experience with Pega to just go in and try to create something."
"Pega BPM could improve the UI, it is poorly designed to have a good UX experience."
Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while Pega BPM is ranked 3rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews. Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Provides built-in frameworks that can be reused and reduces time and cost". Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Bizagi and SAP Signavio Process Manager, whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, IBM BPM and Microsoft Power Apps. See our Nintex Process Platform vs. Pega BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
