We performed a comparison between Check Point SandBlast Network and Trend Micro Deep Discovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."In terms of the scalability, it's expandable across the cloud."
"The technology is impressive in general."
"It has caught some harmful attachments and downloads."
"The most valuable feature of Check Point SandBlast Network is the sandboxing of PDF and Microsoft system files."
"The sandbox is able to scan files without adding a delay or compromising productivity."
"It looks out for new cyber threats and generates predictions based on behaviors that are already detected on a daily basis."
"The product gives us advanced protection, including artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies and services."
"SandBlast updates the threat signatures frequently."
"One of the most valuable features is the performance, since, so far, we have not faced any issues with Deep Discovery."
"The tool's stability and performance are good."
"I like the sales operations testing. and support."
"As a security product, managing threats is crucial for my clients."
"The most valuable features are monitoring for advanced persistent threats, the system runs in a sandbox allowing for effective zero-day exploits management, and the Inspector has a built-in sandbox."
"The HTML file sandboxing is very good."
"Deep Discovery is scalable and compatible with other products. It's crucial to have that compatibility because it's an integral part of our security solution. It integrates smoothly. The interface is user-friendly, so administration is simple."
"The platform provides all essential features for discovery and administration."
"Today, we have it as part of a solution or a package. However, we'd like there to be a way where we can have the solution's features available to us in a cheaper way in the future."
"The guides or best practices of Check Point are difficult to find for the client. Therefore, it is sometimes difficult to make better implementations."
"I would like if it could emulate bigger files and somehow improve this usability. I don't know if this would be possible. However, if it was able to scan or emulate bigger files, then it would be safer for a company using it."
"There should be some improvement in the solution's stability and scalability."
"There have been a couple of things that we've tried where we read through the documentation, and we were really looking for some help in implementing, and technical support wanted me to try it first, then call them if it breaks. It would be nicer if they would hold my hand a bit more. It makes me nervous in production, as I don't have a lab."
"There is a limit on the number of files that can be scanned in real-time, which could lead to us being found with our guard down on a high-traffic day."
"The initial setup was complex because of the lack of information from the consultant."
"We have noticed a slight performance hit when the Threat Emulation and Extraction features were enabled, but the protection trade-off is worth it for us."
"Trend Micro can improve the pricing in general. There is nothing else they can add or improve in the solution."
"The solution needs improvement in terms of pricing."
"Trend Micro Deep Discovery is a very expensive solution, making it very hard to sell."
"The solution could be more stable and offer more security."
"The solution should support multiple platforms in Windows, Linux, and Mac. Customers can have different software types. The virtual environment should be able to install and analyze them. The tool also gives only a minimum level of extension support. It may not be able to extract files and give details about them. I would also like to see third-party product integration in the tool. The solution's current integration is only with Trend Micro products only."
"I would like to see them create a rule where It could integrate with the network and start mitigating with auto-detection."
"Some of the end users may not be technically proficient, so they occasionally face problems due to a lack of knowledge."
"Scalability becomes an issue when managing a higher number of customers."
More Check Point SandBlast Network Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point SandBlast Network is ranked 8th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 33 reviews while Trend Micro Deep Discovery is ranked 17th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 23 reviews. Check Point SandBlast Network is rated 8.4, while Trend Micro Deep Discovery is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Check Point SandBlast Network writes "High detection with few false positives and able to handle large volumes of data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Deep Discovery writes "Good threat detection capabilities and offers flexibility for hosting options". Check Point SandBlast Network is most compared with Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Fortinet FortiSandbox, Cisco Secure Network Analytics and Microsoft Defender for Office 365, whereas Trend Micro Deep Discovery is most compared with Darktrace, Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System, Arista NDR, Vectra AI and Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention. See our Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Trend Micro Deep Discovery report.
See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.