We performed a comparison between Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Mojo Networks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless LAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is stable."
"The simplicity is great."
"The artificial intelligence feature is very good."
"Overall, we've been very pleased with the performance."
"The AI capabilities of Mist Wireless are superior to other OEMs."
"The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."
"In terms of reporting, in terms of all the user reports, it's very rich."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is Marvis, the AI-driven network management system."
"Meraki is a decent solution for a small company, and we use it in a pretty typical way. We need Teams and Zoom to work, and we need a high level of security because we want our business to remain confidential."
"Cisco's technical support is very good and better than other vendors."
"The solution is very stable. It is a very manageable and secure system."
"The cloud manageability feature is valuable."
"The most valuable feature of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is that it is fast and does the job."
"It improved the installation time."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...The solution's initial setup process was straightforward."
"You can scale the solution easily."
"The most valuable feature is the seamless connection between the end-user on the wireless side."
"The solution is very stable."
"The features that I like the most are the visibility and the firewall, which is very good."
"Security is top-notch with WIPS (Wireless Intrusion Prevention System)."
"We just plugged it in and it worked. That just doesn't happen. We plugged it in and it worked and all 100 kids got on the test and started testing."
"The configuration is simple and the reports can be automated."
"It's scalable. You don't have to configure an access point. Literally, if I needed a new one, I just take it right out of the box, go plug it into our network. It finds our Mojo network, and then it talks to the other access points that are close to it, and then it literally adopts the policies, and meshes itself in our network."
"It is a hundred percent scalable product since its functionalities are good...It is a very stable product."
"Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) could improve if the MIST platform had a built-in master key. This would be an advantage."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"The price could be better."
"They should include SD-WAN features to it."
"Improving third-party integration is key for Juniper Mist's next release."
"The product should include adaptive Wi-Fi to show a more accurate location."
"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."
"Improvement is needed in the user-friendliness of Juniper Mist, particularly in enhancing the interaction with AI features."
"We're are not fully utilizing the features of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN to know a more in-depth analysis of what areas need to be improved. However, the security could improve. It would be a benefit to be able to lock out particular clients that are trying to connect from outside the building."
"The throughput of the switches for wireless could be improved."
"The product's coverage area could be expanded. It would help ensure better connectivity."
"The ease of use is average. It could be more user-friendly."
"The only thing that always causes problems with Meraki is the license. It's a bit of a bugbear with Meraki, and it remains today. So it's an unusual concept compared to the other products in the marketplace, but then it does cause a bit of a nuisance from time to time."
"The customization needs to be improved because it's pretty locked down."
"In some cases, they could include enhanced features in the product, such as a firewall console and traffic analysis."
"The pricing structure could be improved."
"I would like to have a single pane of glass to better control the access point and the switching."
"The user interface needs improvement. It could be a little bit more user-friendly."
"My only complaint about this product is its availability. Not many people can stock it and ordering from overseas is a challenge."
"The distribution can be improved, particularly in this part of the world."
"The setup was complex."
"The solution is a bit pricier than Cisco."
"The renewal costs that come with it are very expensive."
"The implementation could be simplified. Right now it's a bit complex."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is ranked 4th in Wireless LAN with 115 reviews while Mojo Networks is ranked 20th in Wireless LAN with 16 reviews. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is rated 8.2, while Mojo Networks is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN writes "Offers good mobility, stability and scalability ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mojo Networks writes "The product is easy to deploy since it can be done seamlessly with zero testing ". Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Ubiquiti Wireless, Mist AI and Cloud and Cisco Wireless, whereas Mojo Networks is most compared with Mist AI and Cloud, Aruba Wireless and Cisco Wireless. See our Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.