We performed a comparison between Cisco Wireless and Ubiquiti WLAN based on our users’ reviews in our categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Both solutions received very positive reviews from users. Cisco Wireless has a slight edge over Ubiquiti WLAN since users feel it has better stability and better technical support.
"The solution is pretty generic and easy to use."
"The simplicity is great."
"The artificial intelligence feature is very good."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is Marvis, the AI-driven network management system."
"It provides private network access, helping us protect our company’s devices."
"You can easily monitor, manage, and cover all your IT equipment."
"The solution is stable."
"The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."
"The most valuable features are that it is easy to install and the range is good."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the Cisco CleanAir and Cisco RRM."
"The tool is mainly improving our productivity."
"The product offers educational licenses that are priced very reasonably."
"Cisco Wireless is highly stable."
"Some of the features I find valuable are the FlexConnect and overall it is a good global solution."
"It is an extremely stable and scalable solution. Its documentation and support are also very good."
"The initial setup was quite easy. We have a very good relationship with our integrator and our integrator has a good relationship with Cisco. The integrator that installs Cisco is quite knowledgeable about the technology. They are trained and have a good relationship with their tech. We cannot be experts in each domain and we have to be supported by an integrator."
"The solution works well and in the short time I have used it, I've enjoyed its capabilities."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The most valuable feature is the level of security on the Wi-Fi network."
"Ubiquiti WLAN is a reliable, stable, and robust solution."
"Ubiquiti provides good connectivity for the end-user, so I think it's stable."
"The most valuable feature of Ubiquiti WLAN is its stability."
"I have found Ubiquiti WLAN scalable. We have approximately 200 users using the solution in my organization and do not plan to increase usage."
"The ease of use and simplicity of the solution is its most valuable feature. This tool is best suited for small environments."
"They should include SD-WAN features to it."
"Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) could improve if the MIST platform had a built-in master key. This would be an advantage."
"Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points’ support services need improvement."
"The solution is expensive."
"The pricing is very high in the Indian market."
"There is room for improvement in terms of support and installation."
"The product should include adaptive Wi-Fi to show a more accurate location."
"I need a bit more time with it before criticizing the features."
"The solution's pricing should be improved."
"The coverage provided by the solution is an area of concern in some cases, making it an area where improvements are required."
"The web interface for Cisco controllers could be better. It could be more user-friendly. Sometimes I have to remember how to access some functionalities or how to enable or execute some functions. If it were more user-friendly it would save time."
"The integration with our CM and other technologies could improve this solution."
"The media stream and Mojo settings are not sufficiently supported."
"In the next release, I would like to see some AI capability deployed. Other competitors like Mist and Juniper already have it. So, AI features need to be introduced next year."
"Cisco is costlier relative to other solutions."
"Requires a firewall body to improve security."
"The product’s bandwidth could be better."
"They could enhance their products by integrating cloud access into each device."
"When they release new products, you should know if there backward compatibility, or do you have to replace the entire forklift, It is useful to understand their strategy and where they are headed."
"The statistics you can get on it are a bit limited from what I have seen so far."
"Cloud management is one feature that should be included in the next release. This tool is best suited for small environments, not large and complex ones."
"The solution could improve by having a cloud version. A cloud version is the easiest to configure anywhere in the world."
"The product needs to improve the user interface in the migration from old to new versions."
"Largely we're happy with the product, however, the firmware deployments could maybe be managed a little bit differently."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Wireless is ranked 2nd in Wireless LAN with 147 reviews while Ubiquiti WLAN is ranked 5th in Wireless LAN with 38 reviews. Cisco Wireless is rated 8.2, while Ubiquiti WLAN is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Cisco Wireless writes "Allows us to deploy a wide range of wireless products with stable WiFi". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti WLAN writes "Helps to build VPNs but improvement is needed in stability ". Cisco Wireless is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Mist AI and Cloud and Omada Access Points, whereas Ubiquiti WLAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Huawei Wireless, Omada Access Points and WatchGuard Secure Wi‑Fi. See our Cisco Wireless vs. Ubiquiti WLAN report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
