We performed a comparison between Ruckus Wireless and Ubiquiti WLAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless LAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."With Mist, every Wednesday they roll out new features."
"The simplicity is great."
"The AI capabilities of Mist Wireless are superior to other OEMs."
"It provides private network access, helping us protect our company’s devices."
"The artificial intelligence feature is very good."
"Juniper Mist offers valuable features like comprehensive network insight, granular policy control, fast device setup, strong security, and efficient SSL traffic management."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Mist is the Virtual Network Assistant, powered by artificial intelligence."
"The solution is pretty generic and easy to use."
"There is better security on our internal SSID/VLAN due to the use of Zero-IT."
"It gives you the whole user session, and you can tell that the client connected at the traffic post."
"Very reliable."
"Analyzes real-time, in-depth network performance."
"Mesh networking and antenna patterns are the most valuable features of the solution."
"Stability has been very good. It is reliable."
"The APs themselves have been pretty solid. We haven't had too many of them go bad or anything like that. The wireless performance seems pretty good. The ability to provision the devices is pretty good, and the back end is also pretty good."
"Ruckus Wireless is an easy to manage solution."
"The product is simple to use in terms of GUI and dashboard."
"Anyone can buy the product off the shelf and configure it."
"Ubiquiti WLAN is a reliable, stable, and robust solution."
"It is similar to the switches, where it is one of those things where it just works. They are very reliable."
"The solution has a lot of great features."
"The ease of use and simplicity of the solution is its most valuable feature. This tool is best suited for small environments."
"The management features are valuable."
"The initial setup was very straightforward."
"They should include SD-WAN features to it."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."
"The pricing should be made cheaper."
"Improvement is needed in the user-friendliness of Juniper Mist, particularly in enhancing the interaction with AI features."
"Improving third-party integration is key for Juniper Mist's next release."
"Enrolling into the tool is a tedious process."
"The pricing is very high in the Indian market."
"Mounting options for outdoor access points, I think they could easily improve on that."
"Lacks some analytics features in the control itself."
"The tool needs to incorporate training. Also, it needs to improve the range of coverage."
"The cost could be improved."
"We use this solution in a certain way, and it works very well. So, I don't expect it to do a lot more, but to do what it's doing probably better or faster. But it's not a problem with the features; it's more the operations."
"It is extremely difficult to send videos in Ruckus live sessions. Zoom streaming, or using Teams Streaming live sessions to send videos, for example, could be more effective."
"I recommend enhancing flexibility for administrators within the Partner Domain."
"Its security can be improved. It doesn't use Wireless IPS. Therefore, we have to combine WatchGuard that uses a Wireless IPS but is a separate solution. These two solutions work in conjunction. We are using the WatchGuard as a sensor and Wireless IPS, and Ruckus is like a platform that is used for the connectivity of the network."
"The solution should improve stability."
"They could enhance their products by integrating cloud access into each device."
"The solution is stable but could improve."
"The statistics you can get on it are a bit limited from what I have seen so far."
"The product’s bandwidth could be better."
"The support needs improvement. The official support is kind of complex. It's not that straightforward compared to Cisco and Aruba."
"The solution should support a larger bandwidth or distance between the access points and the main stations."
"The logs are not detailed enough. You can't clearly see what is being blocked in Ubiquiti WLAN, making the troubleshooting process a little bit harder."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Ruckus Wireless is ranked 3rd in Wireless LAN with 97 reviews while Ubiquiti WLAN is ranked 5th in Wireless LAN with 39 reviews. Ruckus Wireless is rated 8.6, while Ubiquiti WLAN is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Ruckus Wireless writes "Great wireless, good reliability, and excellent connectivity". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti WLAN writes "Helps to build VPNs but improvement is needed in stability ". Ruckus Wireless is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, ExtremeWireless and Omada Access Points, whereas Ubiquiti WLAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless, Huawei Wireless, Omada Access Points and WatchGuard Secure Wi‑Fi. See our Ruckus Wireless vs. Ubiquiti WLAN report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.