We performed a comparison between Commvault Cloud and Iron Mountain Connect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Backup and Recovery solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The use of hyperscale storage hardware and Commvault software has allowed us to create a large storage pool and achieve significant savings in our back-end storage costs."
"It helped us reduce the number of servers that are required for a stable operation."
"We specialize in Commvault and IntelliSnap. Commvault covers all our customers' backup needs in one system, and they have complete control over their Snapshot backups. Snapshots are important to our customers because of the size of their data sets."
"The solution is very stable and offers a good level of performance."
"The diversity on offer is very, very good. Everything is supported. It's great."
"Commvault's many features can be explored to get more value from more solutions."
"This is a very stable product."
"The data is well-protected. It doesn't age off until it's copied. That's a big feature right there. When you reach the end of your retention, it does not expire until the secondary copy is completed. That allows you to hold onto data that otherwise would have aged off by retention. I like that feature. It's hard to just delete or lose data using the Commvault platform."
"The most valuable feature for me is the policy management capabilities"
"You need quite a lot of human resources to maintain a Commvault environment, to keep it operational. Also, it would be nice to if there were an easier way set up some Commvault components."
"With respect to the cloud, they need to offer more integrations."
"There is room for improvement in the data center application running on the cloud for the platform."
"The product does not provide an option to save a copy of data on-premises."
"We are using a production environment with customer-sensitive data on it. As per our central bank rules and regulations, we can't keep our customer's sensitive data in the cloud."
"We previously had difficulty with the support being foreign."
"I would like to see some of the code execute a little bit better when I add new licenses and assign licenses to users. I'd like to see that information update a little quicker."
"Commvault HyperScale X is more expensive for hybrid environments than traditional solutions."
"I would like to see more integration with different platforms."
Commvault Cloud is ranked 3rd in Backup and Recovery with 104 reviews while Iron Mountain Connect is ranked 39th in Backup and Recovery with 2 reviews. Commvault Cloud is rated 8.6, while Iron Mountain Connect is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Commvault Cloud writes "Provides excellent visibility and helps reduce costs and time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Iron Mountain Connect writes "Good policies related to data". Commvault Cloud is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365, Azure Backup and Zerto, whereas Iron Mountain Connect is most compared with IBM Spectrum Protect, NAKIVO Backup & Replication and Veeam Backup & Replication. See our Commvault Cloud vs. Iron Mountain Connect report.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.