We performed a comparison between Iron Mountain Connect and NAKIVO Backup & Replication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Backup and Recovery solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature for me is the policy management capabilities"
"The most valuable feature is the ease of creating a backup copy job to get the backups to a second device."
"The solution is stable; there is no need to retry any sort of jobs in daily operations."
"The ability to use a variety of cloud providers rather than being tied into one is a huge bonus."
"The ability to restore in a catastrophic event is priceless, since every company must use a backup solution of some sort."
"The chat functionality with Nakivo Support in the web interface is very unique and we love it."
"The virtual appliance for VMware vSphere is easy to deploy, easy to manage, and we have no need for additional Windows licenses."
"Before using Nakivo Backup & Replication, all our data backup processes took a long time and did not optimize the disk space reserved for backup. With the introduction of Nakivo Backup & Replication, saving times have been reduced by almost half (thanks to the use of several simultaneous transporters) and the space occupied has also had a very important reduction."
"The ability to create a replica of all virtual machines is a great feature."
"I would like to see more integration with different platforms."
"There is a lack of native (web-based) update functionality."
"The product needs to improve backup speed and replication speed."
"I would like to have a built-in SNMP client, which is important if we want to monitor it using Zabbix, Nagios, or another monitoring solution."
"It is missing the file and folder backup; however, this product is meant for virtual machine backup and recovery, so that is really outside of the scope of the software."
"What must be improved is the response time to technical support requests."
"My first thought was maybe the GUI could be improved, although it works."
"An additional feature that would be appreciated is disaster recovery automation."
"In the press releases, it would be useful to make sure that the manual space reclaim procedure does not have to be performed but that it happens automatically, thus optimizing the use of space."
Iron Mountain Connect is ranked 39th in Backup and Recovery with 2 reviews while NAKIVO Backup & Replication is ranked 6th in Backup and Recovery with 85 reviews. Iron Mountain Connect is rated 8.6, while NAKIVO Backup & Replication is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Iron Mountain Connect writes "Good policies related to data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NAKIVO Backup & Replication writes "Good deduplication, easy to configure, and offers a free version". Iron Mountain Connect is most compared with IBM Spectrum Protect and Veeam Backup & Replication, whereas NAKIVO Backup & Replication is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup, Acronis Cyber Protect, Rubrik and Zerto. See our Iron Mountain Connect vs. NAKIVO Backup & Replication report.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.