We performed a comparison between Comodo RMM and Kaseya VSA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We like the auto containment feature."
"The most valuable features of Comodo RMM are the security antivirus and the ability to use other applications like the PSA and the ticketing system on one dashboard."
"The management feature is very good. You get a complete and clear view of the employment tool on Linux, Mac, and Windows operating systems (even on mobile). Third-party integration is also possible (e.g., IBM, Apple, etc.)."
"The remote support is the most valuable aspect of the solution."
"The training that we received was quite good."
"The remote management is quite good. Also, the patch management and service desk are great features of the solution."
"The ease of access and ease of use was great."
"The most valuable features of this solution are automation, inventory, and patch management."
"I like the Live Connect module provided by Kaseya. It is a powerful module. I also like the Agent Procedure module. We work with it most of the time."
"The most valuable piece of the puzzle for me is what they call Live Connect. It is the piece that allows you to support an end-user without having to take the keyboard and mouse."
"The most valuable feature of Kaseya VSA is the ability to control laptops remotely."
"Comodo RMM is really, really slow to load, and connecting with most of my clients takes a while."
"They should integrate email security in the same solution."
"The solution needs further integration with other software tools like a CRM and other accounting tools. Not having this integration makes Comodo RMM limited in functionality. Additionally, more network management features would be good to have in the next release."
"Its scripting language kind of sucked. They have their own version of PowerShell inside VSA. if you want to reach out and grab endpoint information, for instance, to know how many end devices have a program installed, you actually have to write a script for that. It wasn't like how it is in CrowdStrike where you can just do a search, and it just happened. In VSA, you have to write your own script to do it. In terms of new features, an integrated MDM for mobile devices would be awesome."
"The deployment process could be better."
"The way it is laid out can be improved. If it could be a little more intuitive, it might be a little bit easier. Sometimes, it is hard to find features because they're called something weird, or they're in an interesting location that you wouldn't have thought that they'd be in."
"The reporting feature in Kaseya VSA could improve by being more user-friendly. The reporting overview is too wordy or the representation can be better."
"If you compare with other products, Manage Engine has some features that we like but are not present in Kaseya."
"I would like to see improved virtual infrastructure management."
"The agent-based monitoring solution can be improved."
"The stability of the solution is good but it can be improved."
Comodo RMM is ranked 11th in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 3 reviews while Kaseya VSA is ranked 2nd in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 29 reviews. Comodo RMM is rated 8.4, while Kaseya VSA is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Comodo RMM writes "Great remote controlling and monitoring features with a competitive price". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kaseya VSA writes "Single portal management, cost-saving, with thorough technical support". Comodo RMM is most compared with NinjaOne and Atera, whereas Kaseya VSA is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager, ConnectWise Automate, NinjaOne, Microsoft Windows Server Update Services and Datto Remote Monitoring and Management. See our Comodo RMM vs. Kaseya VSA report.
See our list of best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) vendors.
We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.