Cortex XSIAM vs Splunk SOAR comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Palo Alto Networks Logo
156 views|106 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Splunk Logo
6,537 views|3,915 comparisons
86% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cortex XSIAM and Splunk SOAR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, CrowdStrike, Securonix Solutions and others in Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR).
To learn more, read our detailed Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) Report (Updated: June 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable features of Cortex XSIAM are the machine learning used to identify threats, the complexity of the environment of products, and efficiency.""It is an effective solution in terms of performance and functionalities.""Its ability to deliver a substantial amount of security intelligence greatly enhances and optimizes our security operations program.""It operates on a single, extensive database which enables it to excel in detecting threats and anomalies across the network and endpoints, delivering a highly effective and comprehensive security solution."

More Cortex XSIAM Pros →

"Workflow management is most valuable. It is easily customizable""Before its use, analyzing each email would take at least 15 to 20 minutes, with some complex cases taking up to 30 minutes...With the automation provided by Splunk Phantom, we could significantly reduce the amount of time and human effort required to complete this task.""I have found all the security automation platform features of Splunk SOAR to be good. The Automation playbook development is highly useful.""The most valuable feature is the risk-based access control.""So far, the interface is very easy to use.""The customization continues to be excellent.""Very flexible integration with other tools""The tool's most valuable feature is its searchability and ease of action on the logs. I can easily search within the logs and take action on them, and I can trace them back to my environment because the way the logs are written is very helpful for us."

More Splunk SOAR Pros →

Cons
"The support could be a bit faster.""The solution’s pricing and technical support could be improved.""Further integration capabilities with various other software products that can seamlessly tie into Cortex XSIAM would be advantageous.""The platform isn't very developer-friendly and it should provide more flexibility and ease."

More Cortex XSIAM Cons →

"And most of the challenges that I have faced with the solution can be found in the documentation itself.""Splunk SOAR should improve its ease of upgrade, which is a pain point for us right now.""The pricing could be a bit more reasonable. It would be great if it were feasible for smaller organizations.""Splunk's support for integration is subpar and has room for improvement.""Portability is one thing that is currently lacking. The open-source product that I evaluated had portability. It would require a lot of development effort, but it will save the cost of rewriting all the playbooks.""We've run into a few minor issues. Some of the playbook writing is a bit complicated. We've had a few hiccups with the source control. We'd really like to use GitHub deployment keys for a dedicated account. We haven't been able to do that. I think those are some of the major ones.""The tool's response is slower because it has to search through a huge dataset, which can be improved for latency.""The algorithm and machine learning have room for improvement and can be more user-friendly."

More Splunk SOAR Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "In terms of pricing, we found Cortex XSIAM to offer a very reasonable and competitive rate."
  • "The solution comes at a significant cost."
  • "The solution is expensive compared to its competitors."
  • "Since Palo Alto is trying to get as many new customers as possible, they're offering very competitive pricing."
  • More Cortex XSIAM Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I don't know the exact price, but for my region, it is very expensive."
  • "In my opinion, the price is high, but if you want good products, you have to be willing to pay for them."
  • "It's very overpriced because it is based on the number of users. There is no bulk licensing."
  • "Splunk SOAR is more expensive compared to other options for SOAR."
  • "The licensing cost is reasonable."
  • "When we first purchased our Splunk SOAR license, it was based on an event-count model. It was based on the number of events. I had strong opinions at the time that automation should not be stifled by the amount of automation you can accomplish, so the previous structure was not as beneficial for us. Later that year, we got told or saw at a conference that they announced user-based pricing. We are now in a renewal period, so we migrated to a user-based license model, which is more appropriate for us so that we no longer have to worry about stifling our automation based on the quantity."
  • "Splunk SOAR is an expensive solution for an organization of our size."
  • "The cost is high and the licensing is on an annual basis."
  • More Splunk SOAR Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It is an effective solution in terms of performance and functionalities.
    Top Answer:I would rate the solution's cost a six out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.
    Top Answer:There is room for improvement in the support. It could be a bit faster.
    Top Answer:Splunk SOAR's quick response to incidents is the most valuable part.
    Top Answer:The cost is high and the licensing is on an annual basis.
    Top Answer:The cost of Splunk SOAR has room for improvement.
    Ranking
    Views
    156
    Comparisons
    106
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    1,017
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    6,537
    Comparisons
    3,915
    Reviews
    23
    Average Words per Review
    779
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Phantom
    Learn More
    Overview

    By design, XSIAM operates across both cloud and enterprise security operations, providing true end-to-end-management of threats, wherever they originate. While companies born in the cloud benefit from the scale and automation of XSIAM and the ease of integration with public cloud and SaaS telemetry, organizations with legacy SIEM deployments can seamlessly transition to XSIAM as the next-generation autonomous SOC platform.

    Splunk SOAR offers features like automation and orchestration of manual tasks, speeding up work, detection and response to advanced and emerging threats. 

    Go from overwhelmed to in-control

    Automate manual tasks. Address every alert, every day. Establish repeatable procedures that allow security analysts to stop being reactive and focus on mission-critical objectives to protect your business.

    Force multiply your team

    Orchestrate and automate repetitive tasks, investigation and response to increase efficiency and productivity, and do more with the people you already have. Make a team of three feel like a team of 10.

    From 30 minutes to 30 seconds

    Work faster with Splunk SOAR. Respond to threats in seconds. Lower your mean time to respond (MTTR) by automating security tasks and workflows across all of your security tools.

    End-to-end security operations made easy

    Take advantage of Splunk Enterprise Security and Splunk SOAR joining forces to provide a seamless and intuitive SecOps platform to prevent, detect and respond to advanced and emerging threats.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Recorded Future, Blackstone
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Government7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm35%
    Computer Software Company18%
    University12%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government10%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise62%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise54%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR)
    June 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, CrowdStrike, Securonix Solutions and others in Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR). Updated: June 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cortex XSIAM is ranked 7th in Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) with 4 reviews while Splunk SOAR is ranked 3rd in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 32 reviews. Cortex XSIAM is rated 9.0, while Splunk SOAR is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cortex XSIAM writes "A robust security operation that ensures achieving automation, stability, and scalability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk SOAR writes "Takes most of the work away, but the time they take to implement new features is a little bit of concern". Cortex XSIAM is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, IBM Security QRadar, CrowdStrike Falcon and Exabeam Fusion SIEM, whereas Splunk SOAR is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, ServiceNow Security Operations, Torq, Swimlane and Tines.

    We monitor all Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.