We performed a comparison between CucumberStudio and Tricentis Tosca based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Regression Testing Tools."The data table that helps in converting a single script to multiple test cases is very helpful."
"CucumberStudio has a very user-friendly interface."
"The best thing is that a person without knowledge about the program can easily understand what happened in our testing process."
"The feature that I have found the most valuable is the recovery and cleanup process. Suppose there is a list of test cases and one test case has failed, it should not impact the other test cases. We can reuse the same test case. We can change the configuration of parameters and then use the test cases on the same thing. So, that's a useful thing. Otherwise, we have to use the cleanup process. Another useful feature is to have our own library files. We can create our objects in the libraries and reuse them. There is no need to create duplicate data for that. They have been giving some enhancements recently which means integration is also there. They've integrated with different software like Jenkins, Bamboo. So, we can also create pipeline points. They have recently given SAP and everything, which is very useful."
"We can also create customized functions. For example, if something isn't supported in Tricentis Tosca Commander, we can create our own function to integrate it with Tosca Commander, so we can utilize it and integrate with the macros."
"We have multiple applications, and it supports parallel execution. It has mobile automation."
"The tool's most valuable feature is Tosca Commander."
"The mainframe testing and UI automation are the most valuable aspects of the solution."
"I would rate the scalability a nine out of ten. We have enterprise-level customers."
"The automation engine is very strong, and it is very competitive in the market in terms of features. They develop a lot of features."
"The product enables codeless automation."
"The reporting needs to be improved."
"I think it would be better if we could also do the reporting with CucumberStudio."
"I would like to see better customer support."
"The integration with mobile testing could be useful."
"More and more artificial intelligence (AI) is coming in. So, some amount of AI to create natural language processing (NLP)-based test cases and manage defects would be very helpful. This is because the technologies have evolved in the last five to six months, so there is a potential opportunity there."
"The tool lags in client-based applications. We have also encountered issues with the features in integrations."
"I would like a better user interface."
"I would like to see better integration with other testing tools."
"The solution is expensive compared to other tools in the market."
"The UI does not have the option of automating the scroll bars."
"The document object model or some aspects of it has a bit of a learning curve."
CucumberStudio is ranked 28th in Rapid Application Development Software with 9 reviews while Tricentis Tosca is ranked 1st in Regression Testing Tools with 98 reviews. CucumberStudio is rated 8.0, while Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CucumberStudio writes "An easy -to -use scalable cloud-based solution which needs some improvement with programming automation and stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Does not require coding experience to use and comes with productivity and time-saving features ". CucumberStudio is most compared with GitHub CoPilot, whereas Tricentis Tosca is most compared with Katalon Studio, OpenText UFT One, Worksoft Certify, Postman and Testim.
See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.