We performed a comparison between Google Cloud and SAP S4HANA on AWS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Google Cloud is its flexibility."
"I have found this solution to be a quick and advanced way to run my models through."
"The solution has improved our web apps so that we can have a canary deployment. GCP also helps us upload new features and changes to our software without impacting a lot of users with the network. The AI features have improved the software as well."
"The features I found most valuable are the cloud run and cloud function."
"Google Cloud is a good alternative solution. I think it's a better fit for Mac operating systems than Windows. If you're utilizing Google Cloud for something like big data, then their big query is decent."
"Simple to use on the web, and makes things easy for a software developer."
"The solution can scale as well."
"The solution is fairly easy to deploy."
"The solution is scalable."
"They have their own instances where you can host your database."
"I appreciate the reliability and performance of SAP S/4HANA on AWS. It demonstrates high integration and stability, making it a widely used choice in various industries, including manufacturing, such as factories, carmakers, and battery production. It effectively covers a broad spectrum of business areas, which is beneficial."
"The tool's installation is easy. I rate it an eight out of ten."
"The product’s high availability is its best feature."
"Technical support is very good from SAP and AWS...Scalability is always available in the solution...With a stable environment, it should be running very nicely."
"Reporting transparency and user-friendliness are the key benefit of deploying SAP S4HANA on AWS. Furthermore, the solution offers a plethora of modules that have proven to be valuable, and there are regular updates available."
"The Fiori interface is the most valuable feature. It's one of the highlights that they offer. The in-memory of S4 is very fast."
"I would like to see some improvement in the accessibility features of this solution."
"The ease-of-use could be improved for less technical users."
"Google Cloud could improve the integration with other solutions."
"Another issue is the applicability of local language data capturing mechanisms, which are more advanced on cloud service providers, but still there is room to grow. Also, their hybrid version isn't available in all markets worldwide, so I'm hoping that it will be released globally soon"
"I would like to see more code generation features that enable you to take user input in simple English and automatically convert it to code."
"The price can be lowered significantly."
"I feel that the Google product is incomplete with regard to internal communications. It is an area that needs some improvement."
"The product could be improved by expanding the initial storage space available."
"I would like scalability to be improved in the future for faster performance."
"The product's implementation phase can be very complex for customers."
"SAP S4HANA could be improved by adding a click-to-deploy model."
"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a three out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy."
"The documentation isn't clear enough."
"The product could use more capabilities in the areas of robotics, machine learning and artificial intelligence, but these improvements are already on the way."
"I would like to see a lower price for the solution."
"More availability zones will help customers choose AWS. I would like to see features that provide easier onboarding for ERP solutions like SAP. SAP has already partnered with S/4HANA on AWS for hosting its public cloud as well. More educational videos for customers to choose this cloud path would be great to have. That is, providing more documentation and marketing material would be better."
Google Cloud is ranked 4th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 66 reviews while SAP S4HANA on AWS is ranked 7th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 35 reviews. Google Cloud is rated 8.2, while SAP S4HANA on AWS is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Google Cloud writes "Great for big data with off-the-charts scalability for storage and databases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S4HANA on AWS writes "With good documentation in place, the solution offers good technical support to its users". Google Cloud is most compared with Alibaba Cloud, Linode, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Pivotal Cloud Foundry and Amazon Lightsail, whereas SAP S4HANA on AWS is most compared with Microsoft Azure, SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Amazon AWS and Alibaba Cloud. See our Google Cloud vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS report.
See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
