We performed a comparison between SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud and SAP S4HANA on AWS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a scalable solution if you have a good cloud infrastructure."
"One of the features that I've found most useful is that It's very simple. They take care of the technical aspects of the data, installations, patches."
"I am impressed with how the solution integrates with the ME system and ALE IDocs."
"It has significantly streamlined our operations."
"This solution is as good as any other S/4HANA SAP solution. The continuous support we get is very valuable."
"Ensuring data integrity across finance, supply chain, and other critical areas is paramount for real-time decision-making. Access to accurate and up-to-date information is essential for data protection. While the digital solution primarily serves basic maintenance, the ability to handle these core aspects efficiently is invaluable for your needs."
"The solution does provide quite a lot of support, upgrades, automated batch updates, etc."
"The most valuable feature is virtual modeling, which is beneficial because you don't really save the data multiple times the way we did in the past."
"With extensive data and a sizable client base, this ensures seamless operations, responsiveness, and overall reliability, addressing our enterprise-scale needs effectively."
"It's easy to use and user-friendly."
"The most valuable features of SAP S4HANA on AWS are that it's simplified and the analytical capabilities are good."
"SAP S4HANA on AWS has high performance. All the data is in one place and it's real-time. When you make an entry you don't have to wait a couple of minutes, hours, or overnight as something the batch process takes time. It is instantaneous and is available to everybody."
"The system has the capacity to manage all these departments in a single box and they're all integrated."
"This product is currently the leading product within this category."
"Provides good performance and regular release of new features."
"The product’s high availability is its best feature."
"They should probably offer more cloud services. Most of the cloud infrastructure providers we have make everything pretty transparent, you know what you're getting, you have all these metrics and measurements and everything in the dashboard. Here you have to go through the contracting negotiations and all those things."
"Customers need to be better educated about using the solution's cloud for digital transformation."
"The customer has a lot of dependencies on SAP which means they don't have much flexibility to go and update the system when or if they need to. They will need to wait for the quarterly updates. It's possible to maybe raise a special request with SAP if it is absolutely necessary."
"Our data centers are in Europe and come under GDPR regulations, and this doesn't apply to the Middle East yet. It causes a lot of confusion."
"Enterprise Cloud's reporting could be more automated to improve content accountability, especially regarding BI reports."
"The stability needs to be improved to be able to handle large amounts of data."
"The main thing is that SAP needs to give better response times for support tickets."
"Customization is an area of concern in SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud, where improvements are required."
"Over the last three to four years, I haven't encountered significant issues with SAP S/4HANA. While occasional system bugs are normal in software, the overall experience has been positive. As a business partner, it stands out as a reliable ERP solution."
"The initial setup could be easier. It's complex."
"The product can be very complex."
"The tool should undergo an overall improvement, including support. Data sharing should also be faster."
"More availability zones will help customers choose AWS. I would like to see features that provide easier onboarding for ERP solutions like SAP. SAP has already partnered with S/4HANA on AWS for hosting its public cloud as well. More educational videos for customers to choose this cloud path would be great to have. That is, providing more documentation and marketing material would be better."
"The product could use more capabilities in the areas of robotics, machine learning and artificial intelligence, but these improvements are already on the way."
"I would like for them to have more integration with virtualization platforms."
"Businesses are particularly interested in process automation, mobile, and web applications. These are the areas that SAP S4HANA is and should be looking to improve on, especially in terms of streamlining processes and automating certain steps."
SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is ranked 8th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 21 reviews while SAP S4HANA on AWS is ranked 7th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 35 reviews. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is rated 8.0, while SAP S4HANA on AWS is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud writes "High stability, reasonably priced, and important for digital transformations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S4HANA on AWS writes "With good documentation in place, the solution offers good technical support to its users". SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and SAP Hybris on AWS, whereas SAP S4HANA on AWS is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Amazon AWS and Alibaba Cloud. See our SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS report.
See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
