We performed a comparison between Helix ALM and Jira based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of Helix ALM are traceability and flexibility."
"The tool offers high stability."
"Helix ALM enables users to build, make efficient and effective decisions, and use least-cost methods for maximum benefit, as fast as possible. They allow you to see and visualize your configuration."
"Powerful features including a good reporting capability."
"It improved communication, as it was a popular tool, and most people enjoyed using it."
"The most valuable aspect of this solution is its ability to connect everything together."
"The most valuable feature is working with sprints and having the ability to create sprints."
"Jira is very user friendly, easy to install, and easy to access."
"The ability to design your own workflows is a great feature."
"We have not encountered difficulties with the scalability."
"The monitoring, flexibility and tracking are really good in Jira."
"The accountability and the equivalent to using, acting, editing, working with Word, and also importing and exporting from Word needs improvement."
"It would be great to see Perforce's strategy is for implementing intelligence into the process via AI or ML. It's not clearly defined, at least not to my knowledge."
"Helix ALM should be able to integrate with other systems better. Helix ALM should also have an easier user interface, and the solution needs to have drag-and-drop tools included in it."
"One thing that I don't like about Jira is that when you do an export, it only allows a thousand issues. So the export feature needs to be better."
"I'd like to see better notetaking capabilities so every user can get notes when someone provides comments on a Jira ticket. So if they don't want to provide the comments on the Jira ticket, they can get the personal notes in a Jira tool for every profile."
"The help desk and services management features are in need of improvement."
"I don't know whether there is a Jira problem or a test risk problem, however, sometimes, we face issues on fetching the reports."
"The release of a MailServer feature within Jira would be beneficial."
"Jira has recently updated their UI, but more can be done to make it even better."
"Because I am a developer, I would like integration with Git Source Code Management so that for tickets, we can reference the code where the change has happened and where the issue is. This feature might be there, and I probably haven't discovered it."
"The solution could improve by having its own tool for quality lifecycle management."
Helix ALM doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 7 reviews while Jira is ranked 1st in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 266 reviews. Helix ALM is rated 6.4, while Jira is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Helix ALM writes "Helix ALM is insanely configurable, with great traceability, and flexibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jira writes "A great centralized tool that has a good agile framework and is useful for day-to-day planning, task management, and work log efficacy". Helix ALM is most compared with IBM Rational DOORS, IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation, Polarion Requirements, Tricentis qTest and Jama Connect, whereas Jira is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, IBM Rational DOORS, OpenText ALM Octane, Rally Software and Polarion ALM. See our Helix ALM vs. Jira report.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors and best Application Requirements Management vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.