We performed a comparison between HPE Wireless WAN and Ubiquiti Wireless based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most important is that the solution is stable."
"It's easy to use."
"The support has been responsive and helpful."
"The WiFi and high scalability are the most valuable features."
"What's most valuable in HPE Wireless WAN is that it works fine for customers with existing HPE controllers."
"The tool is easy to manage."
"We've found the scalability to be good."
"It is a good and stable solution."
"The UniFi Controller Software provides excellent statistical and monitoring facilities."
"Ubiquiti Wireless is extremely easy to set up."
"I have found the most valuable features to be how user-friendly it is and how simple it is to do the configurations."
"Easy to set up and maintain and simple to configure."
"The pricing of the solution is excellent. It offers a great value."
"The indoor WiFi connection works well."
"I like the simplicity, the ease of use."
"Very simple, very basic setup for Ubiquiti Wireless. Its performance in a home or small business setting with fewer access points is fantastic."
"I would say that the integration with other vendors in areas such as management or the visibility of other vendors in the management tools could be improved."
"HPE Wireless WAN could provide better access points and better pricing."
"The HPE Wireless dashboard could be more user-friendly."
"Technical support could be improved. They could respond a bit faster."
"Stability could be improved, and technical support needs to be faster."
"The scalability is good, but it could improve."
"Sometimes it can be difficult to find the right sizing."
"It should be a faster device."
"Tech support is mostly remote and could be better."
"Ubiquiti Wireless could improve by being more user-friendly and easy to use."
"Ubiquiti isn't as good for larger networks as any of the other wireless solutions. It lacks performance, coverage, and some of the advanced capabilities other solutions have."
"I would like a better explanation or better documentation on how to use the onboard spectrum analyzer."
"We tried to create an access point with built-in voice and sound that we could use in schools, for example. We tried to create something that could play sounds or messages out of the access points. We wanted to, for example, use it as a school bell instead of using other equipment. It didn't work very well. It turns out when you connect to the Ubiquiti Wireless access point, it's not possible to send simple messages (like what is going on in the canteen, or some news update for the school, etc.). We had to use the on-premises version, as the cloud version wouldn't allow for this."
"We have an issue with Ubiquiti Wireless every three to five months for one of the access points."
"The technical support services need improvement."
"The technical support is less than stellar."
HPE Wireless WAN is ranked 7th in Wireless WAN with 18 reviews while Ubiquiti Wireless is ranked 1st in Wireless WAN with 68 reviews. HPE Wireless WAN is rated 7.8, while Ubiquiti Wireless is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of HPE Wireless WAN writes " A tool that ensures to provide seamless connectivity to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti Wireless writes "It's cheap and easy to use but isn't suitable for large deployments or complex use cases ". HPE Wireless WAN is most compared with , whereas Ubiquiti Wireless is most compared with Ruckus Wireless WAN, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, Aruba Wireless and ExtremeCloud IQ. See our HPE Wireless WAN vs. Ubiquiti Wireless report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.