We performed a comparison between IBM API Connect and Oracle Integration Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The management of the API and API portal is good."
"The solution is very stable."
"The services that I consume through IBM API Connect are beneficial. It can handle multiple API management."
"Policy configurations are pretty easy."
"The most valuable feature of IBM API Connect is the security of the protocol."
"The solution is very scalable because it's on the cloud."
"This solution is ready to scale and already supports our agile CICD."
"The most valuable feature is the security we get from this solution. I know of a bank that uses it to ensure that everything is secure. The second feature I like is the retail environment, where we actually want to be able to provide as many suppliers and consumers with APIs as possible. If you are well-trained in the writing of RESTful API's, you can actually publish an API in a matter of minutes, test it, and publish it."
"It's very easy to get started on the solution. It's also easy to maintain, scale, and integrate according to cost factors."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service is a really good product and the ROI is very good with it. It lowers development time. A development cycle that may have taken a year without Oracle Integration Cloud Service can drop down to three or four months with it."
"The most valuable features of Oracle Integration Cloud Service are the seeded integrations with many communication platforms, such as Slack and emails. It works best for the historical communication methods. Those are still prevalent with all the other clients. When we are doing the integrations, it makes it a little bit easier for us to communicate the same output over Slack, rather than sending out an email and downloading the report. The number of seeded functionalities within the Oracle Integration Cloud Service platform is better."
"The solution is scalable."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service integrates well and is user-friendly. If you are not a developer or ops engineer you can still use the solution with ease. You do not need to have developers' knowledge, you can easily adapt and learn quickly to integrate the services. They have good documentation."
"The OIC is very good."
"People are able to scale up, learn it quickly, and start delivering."
"The lack of features in something like Oracle Integration Cloud leaves some room for leads implementation partners like us"
"Understanding the architecture, deployment criteria, and communication methods of the installation can be time-consuming."
"The only disadvantage I can see is that it requires heavy hardware support."
"Installation is weak."
"Different versions of the same thing can mean unnecessary duplication."
"There are some performance issues and issues related to asynchronous APIs."
"The installation process could use improvement. I hope that in the next release, the installation process is easier."
"Due to bugs in integration, we have to look for workaround on fixing and using DataPower as gateway."
"The automation and the simplicity could be improved."
"If an inbound file is larger than one GB, it cannot be transformed within Oracle."
"Now the platform is not built in a way that you can define."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service can improve file handling. Currently, our real-time file polling limitation is 10 MB, if that size can be increased it would be helpful. For example, increasing the size from 10 MB to 1 GB."
"Lacks features for more complex integrations."
"The error retrying mechanism could be improved. If an error occurs, it can be retried automatically, it would be helpful."
"Sometimes, the tech support is slow to get back to us. We have had to wait up to two weeks for a response."
"We would love to have more and more ready-to-use interfaces from Oracle."
"It has lengthy documentation, making the process of building applications more time-consuming."
More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM API Connect is ranked 7th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 73 reviews while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is ranked 3rd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 32 reviews. IBM API Connect is rated 8.0, while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM API Connect writes "Good speed and performance, but it's based on a bit dated architecture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Integration Cloud Service writes "An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain". IBM API Connect is most compared with IBM DataPower Gateway, Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager and Amazon API Gateway, whereas Oracle Integration Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), AWS Glue, Mule Anypoint Platform, Oracle GoldenGate and Azure Data Factory. See our IBM API Connect vs. Oracle Integration Cloud Service report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
