We performed a comparison between Mule Anypoint Platform and Oracle Integration Cloud Service (OIC) based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Mule Anypoint slightly nudges ahead of Oracle Integration Platform in this comparison, as Mule Anypoint offers very good API management. Users can easily define multi-tiered APIs and reuse them as desired. OIC’s payload and file polling limitations are some of the features that prevent the solution from being more competitive in the marketplace.
"It's easy to develop APIs."
"The exchange and API management features are the best in the market."
"The solution's deployment and proxy processes are very good."
"The initial setup is quite easy because the solution has a good interface through which the configuration, mapping, and so on can be done."
"The most valuable feature of Mule Anypoint Platform is rapid development."
"The integration potential is excellent."
"The tool's visual features are attractive."
"It has improved our organization a lot because of the increase in productivity, and it has simplified the development of products. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is a highly effective tool where you can build integrations so effectively. If you establish the integration platform, it increases productivity. It helps us to do effective re-authentication, and it speeds the integration."
"OIC's accuracy is quite good."
"OIC offers a number of pre-built technology and SaaS adapters for high productivity for a wide range of target systems, both in-house via agents and cloud/SaaS, via a very flexible range of interfaces."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the SFTP adapters, file adapters, and risk adapters, that we use in everyday projects."
"Provides various ways to secure services as well as providing extensive support."
"The most important part would be the use of connectors. The significant number of cloud connectors available for active integration is its value."
"The initial setup is easy."
"It's easy to build an integration and make changes to it."
"The OIC is very good."
"Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having better integration with MDM. There are challenges when doing the interaction at this time."
"The initial setup should be made easy and the documentation should have some guidance."
"The solution is very expensive. They need to work on the pricing."
"The high price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"It should give better control over account management."
"The inclusion of GenAI in the tool can be good since it is an area that is currently unavailable in the solution."
"The runtime management and connectors could use some work and are vulnerable to breakage after upgrades."
"It would be better if we had a clearer view of the solution's future releases."
"While most of the adapters are available through Oracle Integration Cloud Services, they do not have a lot of features. I would like to see some enrichment in this area and for the solution to go deeper into the applications and upgrade the adapters."
"The support and resources were lacking — they weren't there."
"The solution is expensive."
"We would love to have more and more ready-to-use interfaces from Oracle."
"Our client was quite concerned about the cost, which is something that could be reduced."
"Make it more similar to the on-premises features. For example, if you can edit the code directly rather than just dragging and dropping, or if you can edit the examples by going into the background, and one-click migration, I'd like to see included in the next release."
"If an inbound file is larger than one GB, it cannot be transformed within Oracle."
"The solution's customer service could be better."
More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 1st in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 41 reviews while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is ranked 3rd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 32 reviews. Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2, while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Integration Cloud Service writes "An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain". Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, SAP Process Orchestration, SAP Cloud Platform and Azure Data Factory, whereas Oracle Integration Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), AWS Glue, Oracle GoldenGate, Azure Data Factory and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps. See our Mule Anypoint Platform vs. Oracle Integration Cloud Service report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.