We performed a comparison between IIS and Microsoft .NET Framework based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This is definitely a stable solution."
"The tool shows us the operating systems where our servers and applications are running."
"The solution is easy to use and connects with Microsoft."
"What I like the most is that it is easy to use."
"The product is flexible."
"The solution is highly reliable."
"The most valuable feature of IIS is it does not consume a lot of resources. It does not consume a lot of resources, such as memory."
"The graphical user interface makes it easy for users to configure the sites."
"Microsoft .NET Framework continually innovates, particularly in Visual Studio, which focuses on improving languages, debugging, and .NET functionality."
"It facilitated the streamlined scheduling process by amalgamating inputs from various sources, including location data and other systems."
"The new .NET Core has those middlewares, which are awesome from a security standpoint. With the old Framework or the newer Framework, middleware is basically an event pipeline. You configure and register it, and it handles things centrally. A simple example is logging. With the old Framework, you needed to try/catch blocks everywhere. Here, you configure the logging handler once, and it captures exceptions across the application. I really like the middleware pattern."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft .NET Framework is debugging."
"The most valuable thing about Microsoft .NET Framework is that it is an enterprise-grade language and platform."
"It is a stable solution."
"The tool offers a lot of support, and there is a lot of knowledge material available, along with a lot of community groups."
"The Windows Communication Foundation is the biggest advantage we get from the .NET Framework."
"Presently, some developers do not have technical knowledge of managing IIS, so that needs to be improved in the next release."
"We've never had any issues with the solution, but it's still nice to have overall improvements on it. It could be easier and faster to use, for example."
"In the next release, I would like to see better integration between the cloud environment and the on-premises environment."
"The solution should improve the cluster environment and load balancing."
"The tool needs to improve its performance."
"Scalability issues and security concerns need attention from Microsoft."
"The initial setup could be made easier."
"The price of the solution could be less to improve."
"The product’s reliability needs improvement."
"This solution should include Power BI so that we don't have to use any third-party tools."
"Better integration with other tools to make the operation faster would be an improvement."
"The pricing is a bit expensive."
"Difficult to scale this product for large organizations."
"There are performance constraints when multiple users are accessing the application and that consumes CPU resources."
"This solution is best used with some training."
"The .NET open source community could be larger."
IIS is ranked 1st in Application Infrastructure with 53 reviews while Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 4th in Application Infrastructure with 47 reviews. IIS is rated 8.0, while Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of IIS writes " A simple and easy-to-use solution but not recommended for public apps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Intuitive, easier to develop, maintain, and migrate from the old framework to newer versions". IIS is most compared with NGINX Plus, Apache Web Server, Oracle WebLogic Server, Tomcat and IBM WebSphere Application Server, whereas Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with Magic xpa Application Platform, JBoss Enterprise Application Platform, Apache Web Server, Windows Process Activation Services and WebLogic Suite. See our IIS vs. Microsoft .NET Framework report.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
