We performed a comparison between JBoss Enterprise Application Platform and Microsoft .NET Framework based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's convenient and barebone."
"Stable and easy to handle in terms of hosting applications."
"Its technical support is excellent."
"The solution is quite stable."
"The most valuable features of this solution are scalability and performance."
"The product has a good interface and easy-to-use programming language."
"The solution's technical support is very good...The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"Pre-programmed functions for .NET Framework are widely available."
"The new .NET Core has those middlewares, which are awesome from a security standpoint. With the old Framework or the newer Framework, middleware is basically an event pipeline. You configure and register it, and it handles things centrally. A simple example is logging. With the old Framework, you needed to try/catch blocks everywhere. Here, you configure the logging handler once, and it captures exceptions across the application. I really like the middleware pattern."
"When we talk about .NET development, we use Visual Studio IDE to create these things. In recent years, there have been a lot of improvements in Visual Studio 2022. It would be a daunting task to list all of the features that have benefited us, as it would require a lot of time and effort. However, there are definitely many improvements year after year in .NET development."
"The .NET Framework is easier to use because it provides a wide range of libraries."
"It's easy to create and integrate things."
"Firstly, I appreciate the decision to use Microsoft .NET Framework. I find it to be an excellent language, with a history rooted in providing an alternative to Java, albeit with initial challenges. It is gaining popularity and may be voted the most desirable programming language. What I particularly like about .NET is its language efficiency. While C# is the primary language, the platform also supports others, catering to those inclined towards functional programming. Although I started with Shell, I'm still grasping the concept of functional programming. Despite initial reservations about object-oriented programming, I acknowledge its advantages. .NET is a safer option, and despite criticisms, it has evolved over the years. One notable aspect is .NET's transition to an open platform in recent years, distancing itself from being exclusive to Microsoft engineers. I appreciate the versatility of .NET, enabling code production for a wide range of platforms, presenting a strong competition to Java. It allows targeting practically any physical platform, showcasing its flexibility. These qualities contribute to my positive view of .NET, totaling thirteen aspects that I find appealing."
"A graphic user interface can be added."
"Lacks some functional requirements."
"This solution needs better management UI."
"It's hard to find out the root cause of errors."
"Its architecture needs improvement."
"The solution is difficult to learn if someone is learning it for the first time."
"Microsoft has its own product called Blazor, but I don't think it's quite as powerful yet as React or Angular. That's an area for improvement."
"It would be nice if the framework were able to work with additional environments and systems like Linux."
"They should have more training materials available that are specific to .NET. We spend a lot of money training our engineers."
"In my opinion, this solution can be improved by providing out-of-the-box support for different types of libraries."
"The runtime environment for ASP.NET needs improvement to make it more universal."
"It is of great concern to us that the solution is not very powerful on cross platform, at it impedes the ability to build and scale with it."
"They should try to improve their Blazor WebAssembly."
More JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is ranked 9th in Application Infrastructure with 5 reviews while Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 4th in Application Infrastructure with 47 reviews. JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is rated 9.0, while Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of JBoss Enterprise Application Platform writes "A stable and scalable solution that provides excellent technical support with a good response time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Intuitive, easier to develop, maintain, and migrate from the old framework to newer versions". JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is most compared with IBM WebSphere Application Server, Apache Web Server, IBM BPM and NGINX Plus, whereas Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with IIS, Magic xpa Application Platform, Apache Web Server, Windows Process Activation Services and WebLogic Suite. See our JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Microsoft .NET Framework report.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.