Immuta vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Immuta Logo
295 views|205 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
26,458 views|12,900 comparisons
82% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Immuta and Microsoft Purview Data Governance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Governance solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Immuta vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"What I appreciate the most is its user-friendliness.""The tool's most valuable feature is restriction.""Instead of manually tagging data, Immuta’s auto-discovery capability identifies sensitive information, such as country labels, gender information, and other personal data.""All features available are good."

More Immuta Pros →

"It gives you the opportunity to know your data and apply policies around it. If those policies are flouted, you can always track what's happening. You have options such as alerting the person who is committing that action, or you can take automatic action by blocking, for example, an email that is been sent externally. It's very useful.""The most significant value lies in its seamless integration into the Azure ecosystem, automating various processes and reducing operational burdens.""Instead of having to manually write down which tables and columns exist and then describe them, you can do that process in one go, by simply connecting to a source. That's a huge time-saver and a great benefit of Purview.""Their data labeling or data classification is particularly valuable because we want to categorize all of our data into confidential, public, or internal.""It is designed to seamlessly connect to various data sources, which is particularly beneficial for our customers who primarily use Microsoft technologies.""Microsoft Purview stands out for its automatic data recovery system, which prioritizes critical data for the fastest restoration.""Has a good interface and is reasonably priced.""The custom classifications are one of the most valuable features."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance Pros →

Cons
"We have had some challenges with their support when we were migrating to the cloud version. We we had some issues, and it took us several attempts to get a proper responses as part of that migration.""The implementation process with Immuta was quite challenging, primarily due to issues related to database handling and the syncing of user groups.""There is room for improvement in enhancing the monitoring capabilities.""Immuta is behind in updating upgrades and software releases."

More Immuta Cons →

"We have had a lot of issues since we moved to Unified Support. There have been work gaps there, and we believe they fixed them, but we need to make sure that they are going to be sustainable. It is to be seen.""There are some limitations with regard to the lineage of data from different parts of the system.""One area for improvement is the detection of data types. This is really important. It has some of that functionality, but I consider it very limited. Maybe they can add some custom programming or machine learning could be particularly useful for the detection of the nature of the data.""The custom data classification for the African region needs to be improved.""I have some concerns about the separation of roles in Purview from the Microsoft tenant, as well as how they interact with the security portal and endpoint manager.""Running eDiscovery once a day takes quite a long time because it has to fetch your data. I also want the eDiscovery results to be improved. At the same time, I would like to get a centralized page where I could see records management applied to my Office 365 tenant visualized instead of waiting for a custom script to run through the complete tenant.""It could reduce pricing to encourage usage.""I lose a little bit of that control when we're talking about third-party connectors. Compliance-wise, I would like to see more ability to audit from a user perspective, where I could extrapolate what the user was thinking or trying to do."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Immuta's pricing is expensive."
  • More Immuta Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing is moderate. It's not too expensive, but it's not the most competitive."
  • "Microsoft Purview is the best option I have encountered when it comes to price. Maybe some of my information is outdated, but Microsoft offered it so that you could use it almost without paying."
  • "There is some competition out there, but the other solutions are quite expensive. They are enterprise tools that are a bit more mature but the license costs $100,000 for some of them. Purview is pay-per-use and a lot of companies are interested in that."
  • "Aside from the complexity of the pricing model, the price itself is realistic. Features like AI components and automatic classification require additional licenses. Still, anyone can start using Purview with a basic E3 license if they're using Microsoft 365 and grow with additional licenses as needed. Overall, we're satisfied with the price."
  • "Its pricing is good in terms of the features that they are providing, but there are many competitors in the market who can easily provide you with similar services at a lesser cost."
  • "The categorization within the licensing could be improved. There are a lot of solutions within Microsoft Purview. If the licensing could be a bit clearer and the solutions could be better categorized according to function and across multiple environments, that would be excellent. The licensing is very confusing."
  • "Price-wise, I think it's very generous and accessible to not just enterprises but small to medium-sized companies as well. I think it's very fair in terms of how they break apart the storage and the actual computing, and that makes it very accessible. So, that is a very big plus for Purview."
  • "Some people find the tier licensing system complicated, but it offers a lot of value for money if we use the features."
  • More Microsoft Purview Data Governance Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:All features available are good.
    Top Answer:We have had some challenges with their support when we were migrating to the cloud version. We we had some issues, and it took us several attempts to get a proper responses as part of that migration.
    Top Answer:Our use cases are for data access control and data access control provisioning. We also use it for roles and policies.
    Top Answer:It is designed to seamlessly connect to various data sources, which is particularly beneficial for our customers who primarily use Microsoft technologies.
    Top Answer:Currently, the licensing differs for the governance side compared to the risk and compliance side. On the governance side, the charges are based on the usage of Purview, including the data map, data… more »
    Top Answer:Data quality has been a highly requested feature among customers. While it was initially scheduled for release in December last year, I anticipate that this feature will be available soon this year. I… more »
    Ranking
    26th
    out of 58 in Data Governance
    Views
    295
    Comparisons
    205
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    439
    Rating
    7.5
    1st
    out of 58 in Data Governance
    Views
    26,458
    Comparisons
    12,900
    Reviews
    45
    Average Words per Review
    1,368
    Rating
    7.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Microsoft Purview, MS Azure Purview
    Learn More
    Microsoft
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Immuta's Data Access Platform delivers data access and security at scale. Immuta discovers, secures, and monitors an organization's data to ensure that users have access to the right data at the right time – as long as they have the rights.

    The new Microsoft Purview portal offers an enhanced governance experience, serving as a unified platform for managing and governing data across various sources, including Azure, Microsoft 365, on-premises, and multicloud environments. Designed to streamline governance, compliance, risk, and security efforts, the new portal provides a user-friendly interface and unlocks advanced features like live view and preset scans. Existing users of Microsoft Purview can upgrade to this enhanced experience, gaining access to improved user interface, enhanced capabilities, and consolidated management of data assets. Additionally, the upgrade sets the stage for future developments, including account consolidation and fine-grained access control.

    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Healthcare Company9%
    Government9%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Non Profit8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Government9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise77%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business34%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise46%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    Immuta vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Immuta vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Immuta is ranked 26th in Data Governance with 4 reviews while Microsoft Purview Data Governance is ranked 1st in Data Governance with 51 reviews. Immuta is rated 7.6, while Microsoft Purview Data Governance is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Immuta writes "A data governance management solution that helps to restrict sensitive information ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Purview Data Governance writes "User friendly with good documentation but needs to cover more non-Microsoft use cases". Immuta is most compared with Protegrity Data Security, Privacera, BigID, Cyera and Securiti, whereas Microsoft Purview Data Governance is most compared with Collibra Governance, Alation Data Catalog, Varonis Platform, Informatica Axon and Microsoft Intune. See our Immuta vs. Microsoft Purview Data Governance report.

    See our list of best Data Governance vendors.

    We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.