We performed a comparison between Iron Mountain Connect and Rubrik based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Backup and Recovery solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature for me is the policy management capabilities"
"The most valuable features of Rubrik are the restoration and ease of use."
"I haven't encountered any bugs or glitches using the solution."
"CloudOut, because only blocks are pushed after compression and deduplication, not raw sizing."
"Rubrik is a faster unit from a hardware perspective. Things, like Live Mount, mean we can bring services back straightaway, then have them transition back into the live storage in the background. Because we can use Live Mount to do instant restores, a restore is now a five-minute job. Then, the rest of it is done in the background, rather than doing something for an hour before you actually get the restore back."
"Mounting recent backups to create new servers rather than cloning servers in VMware drastically cut down required time."
"Cut backup remediation to nearly nothing."
"Rubrik is stable and easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is the archive to cloud location and the automation around the PowerShell script. There are also reports and dashboards."
"I would like to see more integration with different platforms."
"The dashboard and user interface could be improved to make them more user-friendly."
"It is already very well furnished, but live mounts for Nutanix AHV would be amazing."
"There could be better reporting and better filtering."
"Could be improved from an analytics point of view."
"We have some challenges with the solution's reporting because historical reports have some limitations."
"Needs integration with video CD (coming in the next release) and a multi-tenant GUI."
"I would like to have a built-in index searching ability of files/system files within the Rubrik interface to determine if a file or item exists, rather than just recovering it, and then doing a search for the file afterwards."
"The licensing cost is quite high. That is something that needs to be worked out, because so many times it happens that the team does not have the budget or there are other issues at that time. Cost has become an important factor in deciding whether to continue with the Rubrik solution."
Iron Mountain Connect is ranked 39th in Backup and Recovery with 2 reviews while Rubrik is ranked 4th in Backup and Recovery with 86 reviews. Iron Mountain Connect is rated 8.6, while Rubrik is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Iron Mountain Connect writes "Good policies related to data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rubrik writes "Automates the backup and recovery process, reducing manual human errors and global search allows for granular recoveries". Iron Mountain Connect is most compared with IBM Spectrum Protect, NAKIVO Backup & Replication and Veeam Backup & Replication, whereas Rubrik is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Cohesity DataProtect, Commvault Cloud, Azure Backup and Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain). See our Iron Mountain Connect vs. Rubrik report.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.