We performed a comparison between Iron Mountain Connect and Veritas NetBackup based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Backup and Recovery solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature for me is the policy management capabilities"
"The tool's information transfer and patching up is easy. The solution offers protection from ransomware which is also a valuable feature."
"We can easily expand the ability of the solution."
"It saves time for the backup needs of our organization."
"Veritas NetBackup is very stable and scales out very well."
"The most valuable feature is replication because, using NetBackup replication, we can have disaster recovery of the data we have."
"I like NetBackup's accelerator feature. You can take a full backup with incremental speed and integrate it with block tracking."
"The solution is stable."
"Its ability to cover a large spectrum of products and operating systems is invaluable. We evaluated other products but always found certain limitations like some products had only intel-based virtualization, while others had power servers."
"I would like to see more integration with different platforms."
"It was very complicated, and it required a lot of work in terms of management. We have moved to Rubrik. One of the reasons for getting rid of Veritas NetBackup was the fact that at one point, we had the support staff with 12 to 15 people to manage Veritas NetBackup, whereas, with Rubrik, I'm the only one managing Rubrik. There is one more person who works with me mostly due to the fact that in case I'm not around, someone else knows what to do, but I'm the only one who is a full-time manager of Rubrik. The complexity of Veritas required a large staff to manage it. We had daily issues that had to be looked into and resolved. A lot of these issues revolved around Veritas' handling of VMware, which is why first we moved VMware off Veritas. After we did that, we were also able to reduce our staff count. Their licensing is a disaster. It is extremely complicated. In most cases, Veritas themselves can't understand their own licensing."
"The licensing costs could be more affordable."
"You cannot tell what your costs are going to be by using the dashboard, which is something that should be improved."
"There is room for improvement in the implementation of Power servers."
"I would like to have support enabled for cloud backups."
"The pricing could be improved, and the interface could be more intuitive."
"It's not a user-friendly solution. It's a little bit complicated. The UI is not very friendly."
"The biggest problem with NetBackup is licensing."
Iron Mountain Connect is ranked 39th in Backup and Recovery with 2 reviews while Veritas NetBackup is ranked 5th in Backup and Recovery with 112 reviews. Iron Mountain Connect is rated 8.6, while Veritas NetBackup is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Iron Mountain Connect writes "Good policies related to data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veritas NetBackup writes "Efficient data recovery and replication features ". Iron Mountain Connect is most compared with IBM Spectrum Protect, NAKIVO Backup & Replication and Veeam Backup & Replication, whereas Veritas NetBackup is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Veritas NetBackup Appliance, Veritas Backup Exec and Azure Backup. See our Iron Mountain Connect vs. Veritas NetBackup report.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.