We performed a comparison between Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager and Microsoft Configuration Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HCLTech, Kaseya and others in Patch Management."This solution is stable."
"The most valuable feature of Ivanti Patch for SCCM is the detection logic."
"Endpoint Manager is valuable to our organization because it allows us to connect to our enterprise from remote locations securely. The most useful feature is its robustness and scalability. It is highly scalable and flexible, allowing us to use it in various environments. Additionally, we can specialize the policies related to each device group. This ensures that each group has access to the applications they need for their work and non-work hours."
"Patching is very effective and reporting is very good."
"It saves a lot of money when you can install things automatically and they are installed the exact same way on every computer."
"It gives us the ability to set up schedules, according to what our security requirements are, to automate the patching of our servers and desktops."
"SCCM does everything from A to Z for a Windows operating system."
"Microsoft is being very competitive right now, and they are really investing in a lot of new features to be more competitive in the marketplace."
"This solution captures all the devices in our infrastructure."
"The solution is highly scalable."
"We have some problems with patches not installing successfully."
"In future releases, I would like to see improvements with the feature upgrade for the SCCM, which Microsoft has already integrated. Currently, Ivanti does not give us information about the enablement package."
"Cloud-based improvements need to be better managed."
"I currently need to increase my compliance level in the patching processes which this solution could improve on."
"The configuration of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager could be improved, it is a bit complicated."
"SCCM can improve on third-party application support."
"The availability of technical support could improve."
"The deployment process is lengthy and should be quicker to complete."
"On some hardware, we'd like an easier way to get peripherals attached."
"This solution needs to be supported on all Operating systems."
More Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Microsoft Configuration Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager is ranked 13th in Patch Management with 2 reviews while Microsoft Configuration Manager is ranked 1st in Patch Management with 78 reviews. Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager is rated 7.6, while Microsoft Configuration Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager writes "Provides detection logic that tells us which customer will record an update and is less expensive than other solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Configuration Manager writes "Seamless system updates, useful integration, and reliable". Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager is most compared with Symantec Patch Management and Ivanti Neurons for Patch Intelligence, whereas Microsoft Configuration Manager is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Microsoft Intune, BigFix and Tanium.
See our list of best Patch Management vendors.
We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.