We performed a comparison between JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and SAP ERP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We find the ease of use, customization, and user interface valuable."
"The 1V reporting is straightforward and simple to use. Creating 1V reports does not require any technical knowledge."
"The solution can scale."
"The most valuable features of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne are the flexibility of the configuration, it is highly configurable. It is not rigid as other solutions, such as SAP. They have recently added a custom workflow approach and approval workflows."
"The tool is valuable for its rich set of functionalities and stability. The solution is stable. The customer service and support is good."
"I have found the solutions best features to be financial procurement, inventory, and manufacturing."
"With the new versions, it has become very user-friendly. We have integration with mobiles, and we have cloud-based solutions. There are a lot of things that can be done by front-end users without technical knowledge. They can create reports without having to do any coding, and it's very good now."
"The solution is very customizable according to business needs."
"The most valuable features of SAP ERP are the integration between all departments, such as purchasing, finance, trading, and sales."
"SAP ERP's interface is pretty easy nowadays, as it has evolved over time and has been made as user-friendly as a person would like it."
"It automates transactional processes."
"The solution is quite scalable."
"The most valuable features are the ease of installation and the MM functionality."
"There are many interfaces, so you really can build satellites around it like with other SAP stuff or even third-party stuff."
"Finance view across functions is valuable."
"It provides one overview of the capacity planning."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne could improve the speed because sometimes it takes time to load into the environment. This is typical when the ESU patch packages are used."
"The only issue with the solution that it yet to consider improvements in its price."
"The reporting has to be flexible or it will turn the end-user off."
"They have the interface with Hubble and other reporting, however, we just want that to be a part of JD Edwards."
"What would make JD Edwards EnterpriseOne better is more straightforward project implementation, including reducing the costs associated with upgrading projects."
"Lacking in certain areas of support."
"Forms customization should be easier. Currently, it has to go through the development life cycle."
"The Fixed Asset module is not desirable because it is complicated."
"The solution is not ready for the current e-commerce environment."
"The UI could use improvement."
"The user interface isn't as nice as SAP HANA's."
"The warehouse management could be better."
"License fees are too high."
"It was not designed to service all industries."
"I do not have any notes for improvements."
"Presently, the solution's interface is not intuitive."
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 7th in ERP with 55 reviews while SAP ERP is ranked 1st in ERP with 100 reviews. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2, while SAP ERP is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Simplifies processes, is easy to set up, and offers good integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP ERP writes "The amazing, robust framework with unlimited scalability earns its #1 status". JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, PeopleSoft, SAP S/4HANA and Oracle E-Business Suite, whereas SAP ERP is most compared with SAP S/4HANA, Microsoft Dynamics AX, Anaplan, SAP Business One and PeopleSoft. See our JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. SAP ERP report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.