We performed a comparison between JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and SAP S/4HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The interface is very user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature is the user experience, where you can create your own queries, it sends you alerts, and it's very flexible."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is perfect for our reporting for the management, workflow, and procurement workflow."
"I have found the solutions best features to be financial procurement, inventory, and manufacturing."
"The solution is very customizable according to business needs."
"We do a straight forward, simple plug and play installation so there are no problems technically now."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's most valuable feature is its one consolidated platform that runs all the different aspects of companies."
"We find the ease of use, customization, and user interface valuable."
"The most valuable feature is the perfect end-to-end integration."
"SAP S/4HANA is the preferred database because of its scalability, faster accessibility, compatibility, and other well-suited features for large data sets."
"We're able to get all our processes flowing together. We're able to make all of our business processes talk to each other."
"The most valuable feature of SAP S/4HANA is the innovational process. We are able to receive more efficiency or accuracy than previous versions."
"SAP S4HANA version 1909 is stable. We have not gone live with 2020 yet."
"It's helped with business aspects and improved material planning and RMA processes."
"SAP S4HANA has good performance and has allowed us to combine our systems."
"S4HANA is a completely integrated solution. It's an end-to-end ERP system with strong manufacturing and financial integration, which is not common among ERPs. And it's a solution that's driven by industry best practices."
"We found that the system was unable to address many of our concerns, especially when it comes to project management."
"Financial side could be expanded by bringing in things like the IMS."
"We’d like to see technical support integrated within the application so that it is not required to raise additional incidents or do manual outreach to support."
"Needs better integration with IoT solutions."
"The initial setup was complex...One should get the end-user manual because, in some parts, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is not user-friendly."
"The solution could be easier to implement. However, the complexity was in our internal processes meeting our country's requirements. Every country has a slightly different process, taxation, and rules. That was the difficult part, not the solution itself. I expect our experience would have been more or less the same with any ERP, such as SAP, Navision, or Dynamics."
"They have the interface with Hubble and other reporting, however, we just want that to be a part of JD Edwards."
"The solution could improve by having additional efficient analytics available to more users. They should allow a sample database to be able to test and do proof of concept would be extremely valuable to all of our clients."
"In an upcoming release, it would be beneficial to have more practical intelligence in the system, such as protective maintenance, or artificial intelligence."
"The scalability could be better."
"The difficulty level of the initial setup depends on the person's skills. If you know the basic knowledge of the database, then it will be easy, otherwise, it will be very difficult."
"I have found the solution to be stable but it could improve."
"I think the user interface still needs improvement. While efforts are being made to enhance and make it more user-friendly, there are still shortcomings. Fiori is a great step forward, but work must be done. So, I believe SAP S/4HANA should focus more on improving GUI access. We also had a difficult time migrating the fixed assets."
"Documentation could be improved."
"The solution could be more user-friendly for regular users and developers."
"The solution is complex technically because both an old and a new path exist."
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 7th in ERP with 55 reviews while SAP S/4HANA is ranked 2nd in ERP with 75 reviews. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2, while SAP S/4HANA is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Simplifies processes, is easy to set up, and offers good integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S/4HANA writes "The solution is highly scalable, with solid performance and integration". JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, SAP ERP, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, PeopleSoft and Oracle E-Business Suite, whereas SAP S/4HANA is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP Business One, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite and Infor LN. See our JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. SAP S/4HANA report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.