We performed a comparison between Juniper vSRX and Sophos Virtualization Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Trend Micro, Sophos, Juniper and others in Virtualization Security."The product’s quality and performance are better than other vendors."
"I'm told the solution is the fastest, and, so far, I do find that to be the case."
"There are a few valuable features that offer very good quality on the solution. Especially NetScreen. We used to use NetScreen for the the product line. It was a very mature solution, very robust, easy to configure, easy to manage, etc. It made it easy to do everything."
"The initial setup was very straightforward. There was no problem. The initial deployment took about one hour."
"One of Juniper vSRX's most valuable features is its integration with safety applications. It keeps the software secure from developers without relying on third-party solutions."
"Juniper is more flexible with the commit check and the commit confirmed command. The design of the forwarding and contract plan in the operating system is very important for the performance when we have very big traffic."
"The technical support has been good."
"The features we found most valuable are using the IDS and IPS during protection. The application filtering feature is great."
"The SVM deployment has very good performance."
"Using this solution allows us to set up rule-based access control."
"When it comes to their firewall, it notified me about a possible infection."
"I like Sophos Virtualization Security's built-in antivirus and malware protection. The firewalls are pretty stable. It's just a matter of updating the virus signatures, and they're pretty good about providing those updates regularly."
"The most valuable features of the solution are VM security, VLP, and threat protection."
"We worked with Cisco's support and Juniper's support and there are some differences, to be honest, Cisco is more available and is more competent at addressing our cases."
"There are too many types of licenses, which can be confusing."
"Fortinet is more user friendly than Juniper. In terms of remote access, I actually prefer using Fortinet. It's much easier to configure."
"The reporting can be improved."
"Some people complain that the solution tends to have a steep learning curve. It could be because most people have basic familiarity with Cisco or other similar products and maybe have never worked closely with Juniper products."
"It could use more tutorials."
"They could provide support for cloud deployments."
"They really need to improve the GUI."
"I would like to see some new features for improving the security part of the solution."
"I wish Sophos could offer the solution at a lower price, but I doubt they will."
"We are unable to reliably specify bandwidth limits for particular clients, which is something that needs to be improved."
"Sophos Virtualization Security requires more usage. For example, if you have a virtual service line of 100 nodes, you are unable to deploy them from the console to a particular environment."
"The solution would be improved if all of the advanced features were included in the SVM."
More Sophos Virtualization Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Juniper vSRX is ranked 3rd in Virtualization Security with 33 reviews while Sophos Virtualization Security is ranked 2nd in Virtualization Security with 5 reviews. Juniper vSRX is rated 7.8, while Sophos Virtualization Security is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Juniper vSRX writes "Fast with good usability and fairly scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos Virtualization Security writes "Stable security and VPN solutions". Juniper vSRX is most compared with Juniper SRX Series Firewall, Azure Firewall, Meraki MX, Cisco Secure Firewall and OPNsense, whereas Sophos Virtualization Security is most compared with Trend Micro Deep Security.
See our list of best Virtualization Security vendors.
We monitor all Virtualization Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.