We performed a comparison between Sophos Virtualization Security and Trend Micro Deep Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Trend Micro, Sophos, Juniper and others in Virtualization Security."The SVM deployment has very good performance."
"The most valuable features of the solution are VM security, VLP, and threat protection."
"Using this solution allows us to set up rule-based access control."
"When it comes to their firewall, it notified me about a possible infection."
"I like Sophos Virtualization Security's built-in antivirus and malware protection. The firewalls are pretty stable. It's just a matter of updating the virus signatures, and they're pretty good about providing those updates regularly."
"This product offers good protection against many types of malware."
"DLP, Data Loss Prevention, and the complexity of how we manage the console and how this client, or this tool, will notify us when there is something going wrong within the server and endpoint, is good."
"Trend Micro gave our security teams a certain degree of comfort by just having it in the background, as they have familiarity with the product."
"One of the most valuable features is that it's a firewall-based solution. We just open the required reports to the server—to server communication—and that's how we use Deep Security."
"It can scale well."
"It has improved functions by bringing us complete security on our clients' virtual environment."
"It serves its purpose and works well."
"Their support is good. They are responsive, which is nice."
"Sophos Virtualization Security requires more usage. For example, if you have a virtual service line of 100 nodes, you are unable to deploy them from the console to a particular environment."
"I would like to see some new features for improving the security part of the solution."
"I wish Sophos could offer the solution at a lower price, but I doubt they will."
"The solution would be improved if all of the advanced features were included in the SVM."
"We are unable to reliably specify bandwidth limits for particular clients, which is something that needs to be improved."
"The situation with the currency in Turkey makes this solution a little bit on the expensive side, and if it were lowered then it would be more competitive."
"It would be helpful if they could send emails notifying their users about the recommended upgraded versions to address the newly discovered vulnerabilities."
"The product isn't very user-friendly."
"The implementation can be inflexible and not easy, as it requires knowledge of things like virtualization and administration on Windows."
"Sometimes the patching is a bit slow."
"The solution should focus on the EDR part and probably have an integrated data leak prevention module."
"They need to build in a central console because central integration is not very good right now."
"Enhancements in agent performance are needed, specifically in reducing server utilization during scanning."
More Sophos Virtualization Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Sophos Virtualization Security is ranked 2nd in Virtualization Security with 5 reviews while Trend Micro Deep Security is ranked 1st in Virtualization Security with 81 reviews. Sophos Virtualization Security is rated 7.6, while Trend Micro Deep Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Sophos Virtualization Security writes "Stable security and VPN solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Deep Security writes "High availability, effective VPM, and responsive support". Sophos Virtualization Security is most compared with , whereas Trend Micro Deep Security is most compared with Trend Vision One Endpoint Security, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Symantec Endpoint Security and Sophos EPP Suite.
See our list of best Virtualization Security vendors.
We monitor all Virtualization Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.