We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure and SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The time to market is fast compared back to the traditional on-premise hosting. That is one of the better things I can say because there is no need to worry. The Pack services will enable it to start immediately."
"The feature that we like best is integration with Active Directory."
"We are going to use Microsoft Azure to move some on-premise servers into the cloud so that our data can be held there."
"It has multiple features that can be used from the start."
"I think the single sign-on functionality and the ease with which you can deposit things on the cloud have been valuable. Azure has very robust security functionalities and authentication features, which come with mobility, along with backup and credential checks."
"The scalability is good."
"It is easy to use. It is also stable."
"Its resiliency is most valuable. It is also a very scalable solution, so you can spend the resources on demand."
"There's a minimum amount of downtime when using the solution. This platform is very effective."
"The solution does provide quite a lot of support, upgrades, automated batch updates, etc."
"It is a scalable solution if you have a good cloud infrastructure."
"Fiori is the most valuable feature, as well as the the integration between S/4 and another solution as an extension."
"The processes and the way we take advantage and use assistance are good."
"We have a wide range of use cases for SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud. These include production planning, materials management, sales management, treasury, finance, appliance maintenance, real estate, and warehouse management."
"The interface is easy to manage."
"The solution is stable and we have never had a problem. We started with one terabyte of data when the solution was first implemented and today we have around almost 600 gigabytes of data, which means means the compression works properly. Before migrating from ECC, we had nine terabytes of data."
"The price could be improved as well as the interface speed, and technical support."
"The product is not user-friendly."
"Technical support needs to be better."
"Azure ARM console can be a bit overwhelming at the beginning."
"Lacks flexibility in terms of storage or resource allocation."
"One area where Microsoft Azure could improve is in offering a broader range of pre-built plugins and tools compared to AWS."
"If the price were reduced then it would be an improvement."
"I would like to see the console improved."
"They should probably offer more cloud services. Most of the cloud infrastructure providers we have make everything pretty transparent, you know what you're getting, you have all these metrics and measurements and everything in the dashboard. Here you have to go through the contracting negotiations and all those things."
"Perhaps minor changes to the enterprise structure could be made, but the rest is fine."
"The product must provide more details of the errors."
"It’s a common challenge with applications like Microsoft and SAP that they tend to rely on engineers rather than human resources personnel for knowledge and implementation."
"Customization is an area of concern in SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud, where improvements are required."
"Our data centers are in Europe and come under GDPR regulations, and this doesn't apply to the Middle East yet. It causes a lot of confusion."
"The stability needs to be improved to be able to handle large amounts of data."
"I would rate the stability a four out of ten. It's an area that could use improvement"
Microsoft Azure is ranked 1st in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 299 reviews while SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is ranked 8th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 21 reviews. Microsoft Azure is rated 8.4, while SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure writes "Promotes clear, logical structures preventing impractical configurations and offers seamless integration ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud writes "High stability, reasonably priced, and important for digital transformations". Microsoft Azure is most compared with Google Firebase, Amazon AWS, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Alibaba Cloud and VMware Tanzu Application Service, whereas SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is most compared with Amazon AWS, SAP S4HANA on AWS, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and SAP Hybris on AWS. See our Microsoft Azure vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud report.
See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Hi, It could be easy as Azure is one of the partners of SAP HEC.
Please contact your SAP HEC technical account manager who can guide you on this.
@Harraj Saraon, did you get your answer?