We performed a comparison between RiskOptics ROAR Platform and RSA Archer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC."We can get all the information about all the applications in a single platform."
"The integrated data model of a one-to-many/many-to-one relationship is quite useful."
"It has various valuable features. For example, showing us if a control aligns with specific standards or frameworks helps us understand it better and verify its compliance."
"RSA Archer has reduced the time and effort required for meetings."
"The part I liked about Archer was the risk assessment for deficiencies and being able to use it there."
"It is a very friendly tool. We can easily understand what is going on inside the tool. I like this tool. We can work with the tool for the ERP platform. We can create automated applications based on the requirements."
"Makes auditing much more convenient."
"Solution is scalable."
"Easy to implement with a high level of automation."
"After you change and save the pre-filled specific information at the end of an application page, the application will again take you to the top of the page."
"Archer could be improved by having more customization. I'm not sure if the backend processes have API calls and those kinds of seamless integrations, but from the front, some of the solutions are very out-of-the-box. It's not customizable, so that could be a little problematic since you have to use their features. In terms of the backend structure, I'm not too sure because I'm not a developer—I was an end user and product owner of Archer—and I don't quite know the backend and developmental features. But since it's an out-of-the-box solution, sometimes customization was challenging and support was a little problematic because we had to reach out to them all the time."
"Recently, we made a suggestion for cross references, like for one application to another. There were limitations there, so we're hoping that will be included in the next upgrade."
"The ticket handling process could be improved."
"The financial area of RSA Archer has room for improvement."
"I would like to see real-time data, from vulnerabilities, and threats."
"Slow turnaround time from support team."
"The solution as a whole could be simplified."
"Some areas are not truly automated but are only scheduled."
RiskOptics ROAR Platform is ranked 12th in GRC with 1 review while RSA Archer is ranked 1st in GRC with 38 reviews. RiskOptics ROAR Platform is rated 9.0, while RSA Archer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of RiskOptics ROAR Platform writes "Acts as a software inventory of applications in an environment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Archer writes "A rich application with good workflow, but search feature needs improvement". RiskOptics ROAR Platform is most compared with , whereas RSA Archer is most compared with OneTrust GRC, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance and Workiva Wdesk.
See our list of best GRC vendors.
We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.