We compared UiPath and Robocorp based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
UiPath is praised for its user-friendly interface, extensive automation capabilities, seamless integration, robust security, effective customer service, reasonable pricing, and high ROI. Robocorp, on the other hand, is highlighted for its intuitive interface, reliable performance, efficient customer service, competitive pricing, and positive ROI. However, users mention that Robocorp could improve user-friendly features, stability, error handling, documentation, and customer support.
Features: UiPath is praised for its user-friendly interface, extensive automation capabilities, seamless integration, and robust security measures. On the other hand, Robocorp is valued for its intuitive interface, seamless automation, and reliable performance.
Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for UiPath is described as straightforward and hassle-free, with flexible licensing options. Robocorp, on the other hand, offers a minimal setup cost and a straightforward licensing process, with users appreciating its affordability and ease of getting started., UiPath's ROI is described as substantial, with users mentioning cost savings, increased efficiency, and improved productivity. Robocorp also delivers a positive ROI, with significant time savings and improved productivity reported by users. Both platforms have user-friendly interfaces and seamless integration capabilities.
Room for Improvement: UiPath has room for improvement in terms of user interface, functionality, and performance. Users desire a more intuitive interface and additional features. Robocorp lacks user-friendly features, stability, and better error handling. Comprehensive documentation and improved customer support are also needed.
Deployment and customer support: The user reviews comparing UiPath and Robocorp indicate that there are varying durations for deployment, setup, and implementation phases when establishing a new tech solution. Some users mentioned spending three months on deployment and an additional week on setup for UiPath, while others mentioned spending a week on both deployment and setup for both UiPath and Robocorp., UiPath's customer service and support are highly regarded, with users praising the promptness and effectiveness of the team. Robocorp's customer service is also highly praised, emphasizing the understanding and helpfulness exhibited by their team.
The summary above is based on 325 interviews we conducted recently with UiPath and Robocorp users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"It's easy to deploy bots via the API helper in Control Room. Robocorp's debugging features are also robust. It shows you a lot of data."
"The process execution and all features are very good."
"I like the fact that it's very fast. The processing speed is good, and that's what matters to me. I also like that we don't have to bother with the infrastructure setup. We don't have to care about the status of the data set, as I believe the local group will provide it. We don't care about the licensing model. We only have to care about how long we are using it."
"The price is good."
"It offers high scalability and enables automation in ways that haven't been possible before."
"I can use it as a library by importing Python scripts, allowing me to access its many features while working with coding."
"I have worked with UiPath and Automation Anywhere previously. Robocorp offers an improved development style and support as well as flexibility of its tools. You can easily develop custom libraries in Robocorp."
"The solution is based on Python which makes it very valuable."
"The platform is open, and we can connect it to other technologies. We connect it to SAP using the SAP Connector. We are also using intelligent OCR technology to read receipts."
"The tool's most valuable feature is RPA."
"The tool's most valuable feature is unattended robots."
"The employee's productive hours increased and they were able to handle more transactions and focused on better quality work that needs human intelligence."
"I like the REFramework. It's one of the unique selling points of UiPath because it gives you a framework within the software to structure your processes. It's perfect in terms of error handling and it provides a lot of functionalities for processing multiple transactions. It makes the whole solution more robust."
"The most valuable features are the UiPath studio tools with the recording feature to capture the navigation of the process on the screen."
"The prebuilt AI models that are available in AI Center are valuable to us for things like invoice processing."
"The initial implementation was pretty straightforward."
"An additional feature I'm looking for in Robocorp is SAP automation."
"It would be better if it were more user-friendly for non-technical users. It would be better if they had some drag-and-drop features to create logic."
"The deployment process is complex and not straightforward, especially for legacy modernization."
"I don't like the complexity of deployment."
"There are certain libraries in Python, such as those dealing with PDF automation and word files, that require the presence of certain external dependencies in the environment to be successfully used."
"They should fully develop Robocorp Studio because it would attract a lot of people to the Robocorp platform."
"The standard libraries in Robocorp should be more advanced."
"We use the latest version of the process studio and it takes up a lot of CPU storage. In our case, this has been up to 14 GB of storage."
"One thing that I would really like to see is some migration processes between environments."
"The user interface needs a little bit of improvement in terms of performance. Sometimes, it slows down, but it depends on the OS that you have. If you are running it on Microsoft Windows, it is slower than on macOS or Linux."
"The stability of this solution does depend upon the applications we are using."
"What could be improved in UiPath is the release or update because my organization noticed that a few minor bugs occur from time to time, mainly on the development side. UiPath releases need to be improved."
"Sometimes we get some disconnection issues. This happens maybe 10% of the time."
"We work with Google Cloud and are excited about the possibility of a partnership."
"Optical character recognition for hand written documents could be improved."
"The technical support is a bit of a weak point for this solution, and ideally, they can improve turnaround time so that we don't have to figure things out ourselves as often."
Robocorp is ranked 11th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 13 reviews while UiPath is ranked 1st in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 763 reviews. Robocorp is rated 7.6, while UiPath is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Robocorp writes "The Python base is very valuable for AI and data science but stability could improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath writes "Facilitates end-to-end automation, has good AI and document understanding capabilities, and saves us costs previously spent on manual tasks". Robocorp is most compared with Microsoft Power Automate, Automation Anywhere (AA), Blue Prism Cloud, Blue Prism and ElectroNeek, whereas UiPath is most compared with Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA), Pega Robotic Process Automation and Tungsten RPA. See our Robocorp vs. UiPath report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
