We performed a comparison between RSA enVision and Trellix ESM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The configuration part is very easy...The technical support was sincere in their responses...I rate the technical support a nine out of ten."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the reporting."
"The most valuable feature is the management features. It's capable of managing large enterprises."
"The most valuable feature is the correlation rules."
"I like the ease of deployment."
"The support I have received from the vendor has been great."
"Trellix ESM is very user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature is the capability to correlate different events from different platforms that we feed into it."
"The most valuable features of McAfee ESM are intrusion detection, malware protection, and the device controller."
"This solution integrates easily and very well with other technologies."
"I rate the tool's deployment an eight out of ten. The deployment is completed in two days."
"The integration could be easier, it should support more products."
"In general, the solution currently isn't user-friendly."
"RSA enVision log manager is out of date and is not in use anymore."
"I would like to see improvements to the user interface."
"I would like to see fingerprint recognition included in the next release of this solution."
"There are some banking and transactional cases that are local, South America transactions. I would like to see them add features that can be used locally, to make those transactions more reliable."
"Product currently requires Flash."
"It seems McAfee does test its product before releasing. When we - not only us, other companies also - deploy McAfee, we face multiple issues from the customer side, after which, McAfee reacts and fixes the bugs."
"We acquired the IBM product because McAfee is slightly confusing to use, and it's broader."
"We cannot add new data sources to the most recent version."
"Cloud integration has room for improvement because they're not full-fledged to integrate with the cloud solutions that come. They use different integration platforms to bring in data, and that needs to be improved."
RSA enVision is ranked 35th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 5 reviews while Trellix ESM is ranked 18th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 34 reviews. RSA enVision is rated 6.8, while Trellix ESM is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of RSA enVision writes "Though the solution offers good technical support, it needs to be made more user-friendly ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix ESM writes "Provides visibility of all the traffic within the company infrastructure". RSA enVision is most compared with NetWitness Platform, Splunk Enterprise Security, IBM Security QRadar and Microsoft Sentinel, whereas Trellix ESM is most compared with ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM), IBM Security QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security, LogRhythm SIEM and Trellix Helix. See our RSA enVision vs. Trellix ESM report.
See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.