We performed a comparison between Temenos Quantum and Xamarin Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Mobile Development Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Comparing other solutions with Temenos Quantum, the later is less mature and presents several issues. Implementing Temenos Quantum has been challenging, resembling a nightmare compared to the smoother experience with the other."
"The main benefit lies in its exceptional speed of implementation."
"We can use a single channel to create an interface for iOS, Android, and other channels."
"The visualizer and API manager are super useful. It's easy to create applications for the agent. Automations and other complex tasks can be hard, but it's mostly straightforward. You can create forms and populate tables."
"With the new VM releases, it is a faster product with more abilities that benefit the user."
"The best feature is the Kony Studio, which is the product that is used to develop interfaces."
"I like the complete, professional social site."
"You can do rapid development across multiple platforms."
"The ability to share a platform-agnostic common core, or business logic, enables a mobile developer to write code for all targeted mobile platforms, independent of the individual developer's specialization in iOS, Android, or Windows. This helps not only during development but also enables easier maintenance of deployed apps, since bug fixes or feature additions can be often made in the platform-agnostic layer."
"Xamarin.Forms reduced the effort and time to build and market our solution, market our features, and get our solution into production."
"We very much like the XAML design techniques, multiple layout and pages, MVVMCross support, and portability across different platforms."
"The technical support is very good and it's close to native."
"It allows us to reuse our knowledge of C# and .NET Framework."
"The most valuable feature of the Xamarin Platform is that both the UI are the same in Android and iOS, in one project and Android and iOS, are applications for developing PCL projects. Additionally, the dashboard is good."
"The most valuable features of the Xamarin Platform are that it has cross-platform development, one code base serves a purpose on both, and the grid layout is a lifesaver."
"We were able to optimize the service organization for one of our clients."
"When developing our application, we also encountered certain issues related to delays and time-consuming builds."
"There is definitely room for improvement, especially in the areas of AI, AR, and DR for mobile and web applications"
"It would be highly beneficial if future iterations of Temenos could incorporate support for QR-based payment methods, as it would enhance the platform's capabilities and align it more closely with modern payment trends"
"Some features are only enabled for paid users. It would be much better if they enabled those features without having to pay. I would also like to see them publish information about future technologies on the Home screen under a separate tab. That would be an improvement."
"There are many issues when integrating with native sides when building an Android application of the retail accelerator or an iOS application of the retail actuator. We have to incorporate on the native side of things, which creates a lot of issues. Temenos Quantum is a proprietary product and not open source. There is not much information available on the internet for developers to reference when solving issues. You have to contact the help desk, who will then give you an appointment and work to resolve the issue. In terms of what Temenos can do better, they can make the product more mature so that we do not encounter as many black holes when encountering an issue."
"The security and the interface technology could be better in Temenos Quantum. Additionally, a module that can display all the activities that have been done in the system would be helpful."
"Temenos Quantum needs to improve its usability. It lacks information on the network. We have to contact the support when we are stuck with something."
"The technology of the solution needs an update. It is deficient in terms of connectivity."
"There is limited support for UX widgets."
"From time to time, it is a bit harder to code some specific scenarios compared to the native approach."
"The recent move to .NET MAUI is a big change that's affecting a lot of the good features."
"There is room for increasing the scale a little bit further with the designer in the Visual Studio, more specifically, Xamarin.Android Designer in Visual Studio."
"They need to take a step towards independence from the UI platform. It takes a lot of time to adapt the native controls."
"The file size is a bit big, so you have to make certain layers."
"The Xamarin.Forms could improve."
"Xamarin's profiling tools are only available for the highest tier of MSDN subscription and compatibility with platform-native profiling tools is rather lacking. This causes friction when working on performance-related issues."
Temenos Quantum is ranked 9th in Mobile Development Platforms with 15 reviews while Xamarin Platform is ranked 4th in Mobile Development Platforms with 39 reviews. Temenos Quantum is rated 7.2, while Xamarin Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Temenos Quantum writes "Though a secure tool for building applications, there is a need to improve its stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Xamarin Platform writes "It's about to be retired and replaced with an inferior product, but offers excellent cross-platform development capabilities". Temenos Quantum is most compared with OutSystems, Microsoft Azure App Service and ServiceNow, whereas Xamarin Platform is most compared with Ionic, Appium, OutSystems, Apple Xcode and Mendix. See our Temenos Quantum vs. Xamarin Platform report.
See our list of best Mobile Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Mobile Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
