We compared ABBYY VantageI and UiPath Document Understanding based on our users' reviews in across various parameters. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
ABBYY Vantage is praised for its exceptional OCR capabilities, automation workflows, and data extraction functionality. Users appreciate its integration capabilities, fair pricing, and positive ROI. However, some users have pointed out areas for improvement in the user interface, integration capabilities, OCR accuracy, and pricing concerns. UiPath Document Understanding is known for its quick setup and implementation process, high accuracy in data extraction, efficient processing speed, and seamless integration with other UiPath tools. Users find the pricing competitive, with flexible licensing options. The software has received positive feedback for its ROI, although users have highlighted the need for improvements in accuracy, performance, flexibility, and user experience. Additionally, users highly praise the customer service and support provided by UiPath Document Understanding, finding it to be top-notch and responsive.
Features: ABBYY Vantage stands out for its robust OCR capabilities and flexible automation workflows. UiPath Document Understanding excels in high-accuracy data extraction and seamless integration with other UiPath tools. ABBYY Vantage focuses on flexibility and efficiency in automation workflows and is highly praised for its data extraction functionality. UiPath Document Understanding is known for its high accuracy in data extraction, extensive document type support, and fast processing speed.
Pricing and ROI: ABBYY Vantage's setup cost is relatively low compared to similar products, with a fair and reasonable pricing structure. UiPath Document Understanding offers competitive pricing with straightforward setup and flexible licensing options tailored to individual needs. ABBYY Vantage offers increased efficiency, accuracy, and cost savings, with automation and insights. UiPath Document Understanding provides improved efficiency, accuracy, and time-saving capabilities, highlighting productivity and streamlined processes.
Room for Improvement: ABBYY Vantage could improve in user interface, integration capabilities, OCR accuracy, and pricing. UiPath Document Understanding users suggest enhancements in data extraction accuracy, software performance, customization options, and user experience design.
Deployment and customer support: ABBYY Vantage takes longer to deploy/set up. UiPath Document Understanding has a quicker setup and implementation process, with faster deployment and less time to get started. ABBYY Vantage customer service is praised for being efficient and knowledgeable, while UiPath Document Understanding is described as top-notch and effective. Both offer quick issue resolution and helpful support teams.
The summary above is based on 94 interviews we conducted recently with ABBYY Vantage and UiPath Document Understanding users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"The solution's AI technology is genius."
"The advantage for ABBYY Vantage is in the visual tools to parameterize and set documents."
"The solution responds well to automatic document classifications with a 90% success rate."
"It's a very useful and user-friendly product."
"The UI is user-friendly and ABBYY Vantage supports over 100 languages."
"The ability to extract and insert data, then structuralize it into the actionable format, would be the most valuable."
"While using ABBYY FlexiCapture we did not use the generic models that they do have for invoice and purchase orders. For one of the use-cases, the document was exactly the purchase order, but we are not using that generic model. We are creating the model from Scratch. However, if I was to compare ABBYY FlexiCapture with other IA tools, the machine learning and how the extraction is done is far better than competitors. This allows a lot less effort for the development."
"ABBYY Vantage has reduced our data because it can classify and extract information from documents."
"The prebuilt algorithm for extracting foreign invoices is the most valuable feature because it eliminates the need for us to build anything from scratch."
"We are working with 40,000 different vendor templates. Document Understanding can understand and process various formats without much manual effort to configure the templates. That wasn't the case when we were using Microsoft."
"We can integrate document understanding with other systems and applications."
"UiPath Document Understanding offers multiple types of extractors, which we can use to extract information from documents in a variety of ways."
"The quality of the input documents is crucial because sometimes healthcare providers prefer automated processing rather than human review."
"The best feature, in my opinion, is, we can train the document using a machine-learning classifier."
"AI Center is helpful for creating data sets. Machine learning helps with some extraction. The ML extractor gives good results after training."
"One of the most valuable features is the intelligent recognition of the fields. The algorithm is able to recognize them based on the pattern. Also, the machine learning model enables you to use predefined solutions. The machine-learning capabilities of the solution are very cool."
"The product must provide more supporting documentation on the API capabilities of Advanced Designer."
"It's important to incorporate image detection for signatures or other handwriting elements."
"They should improve the RESTful API side of this solution. Currently, fully RESTful API is not available in the on-prem version, which is really a problem, and we have to work around this limitation. The cloud version already has a fully RESTful API, but the on-prem version doesn't have a fully RESTful API, which is a big mistake. It is easy to solve, but they aren't solving it quicker. They are taking a long time. Nowadays, most people don't go to the interface. They like to use RESTful API."
"In IRISXtract, we can have master data, and we can set the master data. There are more options for taking any data and comparing it with master data. For a project, they have a dump from SAP for validation. This feature is there in ABBYY, but it is not extensive like IRISXtract. ABBYY is capturing the data, but there are not a lot of options to validate the captured data. It would be helpful if there are more options for validating the captured data in ABBYY FlexiCapture."
"Programming interfaces should include intelligence or documentation."
"They say that they have invoice training or document training where if you put in a certain number of documents of the same type and you fix it once, twice, or a few times, it'll automatically be able to read the same document perfectly without you having to create a layout for it to follow. That has never worked properly for any project, so I just stopped recommending it completely. We spent time trying to test and getting a bunch of invoices to test it with, and in the end, it just didn't do what it needed to. If they fix that or if they can improve on that, that would be great. It will save a lot of time for a lot of people, and it will allow people with less experience with ABBYY to be able to use it."
"Since we are using a trial version, we don't have administration access to create a tenant to integrate my OCR series with Postman."
"ABBYY FlexiCapture could improve in the maintenance, and there are some issues. You have to make efforts to do corrections. Additionally, it could be more user-friendly in terms of connecting between different solutions."
"UiPath Document Understanding's ability to read handwritten files has room for improvement."
"There is still room for enhancement in capturing line items from invoices."
"The signature and handwriting are a pain point for the OCR and have room for improvement."
"The extraction and classification process should be simplified."
"It would be much easier if UiPath increased the count of pages. Currently, they are allowing one million pages for $10,000 per month. I would prefer to increase the page count or reduce the dollar count in terms of processing the documents. I would prefer $6,000 per month for processing 2 to 3 million pages per month. It will then be much easier for companies with a low budget to use this product."
"If there were more integrations with Veracode or the AWS server, so we don't have to completely transfer our data and keep data on our servers, that might increase security."
"Its pricing can be improved."
"I would like more flexibility in Document Understanding's validation center."
More UiPath Document Understanding Pricing and Cost Advice →
ABBYY Vantage is ranked 1st in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) with 46 reviews while UiPath Document Understanding is ranked 2nd in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) with 45 reviews. ABBYY Vantage is rated 8.0, while UiPath Document Understanding is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ABBYY Vantage writes "Genius-level AI with very easy setup and implementation processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath Document Understanding writes "Is easy to configure, user-friendly, and produces accurate results". ABBYY Vantage is most compared with UiPath, HyperScience, Microsoft Power Automate, Tungsten TotalAgility and OpenText Intelligent Capture, whereas UiPath Document Understanding is most compared with Instabase, Tungsten TotalAgility, Nanonets, OpenText Intelligent Capture and IQ Bot. See our ABBYY Vantage vs. UiPath Document Understanding report.
See our list of best Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) vendors and best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
