We performed a comparison between Acunetix and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."There is a lot of documentation on their website which makes setting it up and using it quite simple."
"The usability and overall scan results are good."
"Overall, it's a very good tool and a very good engine."
"The solution is highly stable."
"It comes equipped with an internal applicator, which automatically identifies and addresses vulnerabilities within the program."
"Acunetix is the best service in the world. It is easy to manage. It gives a lot of information to the users to see and identify problems in their site or applications. It works very well."
"Their technical support has been very active. If I have an issue, I can reach out to them and get an answer pretty quick."
"Our developers can run the attacks directly from their environments, desktops."
"The initial setup is straightforward so long as your infrastructure, components, and networks are in place."
"The tool has an easy-to-use interface."
"The vulnerability management itself is the most valuable feature as well as references to the mitigation techniques."
"The solution can integrate with third parties and meets standard compliance."
"I would rate Tenable's dashboards and reporting capabilities for illustrating security posture a nine out of ten, with ten being the best."
"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is an easy-to-use product. I"
"The initial setup is very straightforward."
"The solution is easy to use and configuration is smooth with no complexities."
"When monitoring the traffic we always have issues with the bandwidth consumption and the throttling of traffic."
"The solution's pricing could be better."
"While we do have it integrated with other solutions, it could still offer more integrations."
"There is room for improvement in website authentication because I've seen other products that can do it much better."
"Currently only supports web scanning."
"Acunetix needs to be dynamic with JavaScript code, unlike Netsparker which can scan complex agents."
"Tools that would allow us to work more efficiently with the mobile environment, with Android and iOS."
"I had some issues with the JSON parameters where it found some strange vulnerabilities, but it didn't alert the person using it or me about these vulnerabilities, e.g., an error for SQL injection."
"They need to have more dependable and faster support."
"The shortcoming of the solution that needs improvement is related to its capability to do vulnerability assessments on applications."
"The interface could be improved; right now it's running on two interfaces simultaneously."
"They should include better customization of the dashboard, and integration tools."
"They've been able to think about everything in terms of where the world is going and the type of assets that you've got. They've everything sorted out in that aspect, but you have to pay for most of the other components that they've got to give you complete visibility across your tech surface. If it already had those capabilities in-built, without having to add them on to take advantage of them, it would be a very compelling value proposition."
"It's not a user-friendly tool since it has a complicated interface."
"The user interface could be improved by being able to change the user interface to fit your position or your job. The graphs are set in stone and you can only print reports."
"Tenable could improve visibility into assets, including automated asset tagging. You should be able to automatically tag assets based on location, function, ownership, etc. That would help us because we spend a lot of time identifying and tagging assets by hand."
More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Acunetix is ranked 15th in Vulnerability Management with 26 reviews while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Vulnerability Management with 39 reviews. Acunetix is rated 7.6, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Acunetix writes "Fantastic reporting features hindered by slow scanning ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". Acunetix is most compared with OWASP Zap, Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional, HCL AppScan and Fortify WebInspect, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management. See our Acunetix vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
