We performed a comparison between AgileCraft and TFS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites."The linking of PI Objectives with different features was one of the cool things. It had features, epics, and stories out of the box."
"I have found almost all of the features valuable because it integrates well with your Microsoft products. If a client is using the entire Microsoft platform, then TFS would be definitely preferable. It integrates with the digital studio development environment as well."
"As far as queries are concerned, creating, grading, or customizing the queries as a primary requirement is very easy to do."
"The most valuable feature is integration, particularly if you have a .NET application."
"It has great functionality: work items, backlogs, source code, build releases, and it's easy to use."
"The interface is easy to navigate."
"The solution is very much stable."
"The most valuable feature from my point of view is project management, which includes user stories as well as task management."
"Some of the valuable features are version control and the ability to create different collections in terms of segregating the authorization for teams who connect to small projects."
"It should just have the integration with Jira. We haven't looked at it since Atlassian bought the product."
"Overall, I think it would be useful to have something similar where Microsoft comes up with supporting concepts of scaling Agile in TFS so that clients don't have to look for a separate tool."
"TFS needs to be stable."
"I would like to see the reporting features expanded so that I can see details on the users connected to all of the projects."
"TFS's CI/CD, project pipelines, and management development could be improved."
"There are many things that I cannot do, and I have a lot of bugs."
"The program and portfolio planning facility can be improved."
"Since the TFS was an on-prem solution, the private network accessibility was restricted."
"Since it is Microsoft, it is technology agnostic, thus it does not really fit into various different technologies in the organization."
Earn 20 points
AgileCraft is ranked 19th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites while TFS is ranked 3rd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 93 reviews. AgileCraft is rated 7.0, while TFS is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AgileCraft writes "Linking of PI Objectives with different features was cool, but it didn't have integration with Jira". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TFS writes "It is helpful for scheduled releases and enforcing rules, but it should be better at merging changes for multiple developers and retaining the historical information". AgileCraft is most compared with Jira and Jira Align, whereas TFS is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Rally Software, TestRail and OpenText ALM / Quality Center.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.