Algolia vs Elastic Search comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Algolia Logo
877 views|685 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Elastic Logo
3,475 views|1,221 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Algolia and Elastic Search based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft and others in Search as a Service.
To learn more, read our detailed Search as a Service Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It's scalable. It can be scaled massively.""The Algolia solution really helped us to improve our conversion rate and click through rate."

More Algolia Pros →

"It's a stable solution and we have not had any issues.""The most valuable feature of Elastic Enterprise Search is user behavior analysis.""The most valuable features are the data store and the X-pack extension.""I value the feature that allows me to share the dashboards to different people with different levels of access.""The initial setup is very easy for small environments.""The most valuable features are its user-friendly interface and seamless navigation.""The product is scalable with good performance.""The most valuable feature of Elastic Enterprise Search is the Discovery option for the visualization of logs on a GPU instead of on the server."

More Elastic Search Pros →

Cons
"Joining is quite complex.""I think they could improve the analytics view."

More Algolia Cons →

"There are potential improvements based on our client feedback, like unifying the licensing cost structure.""The metadata gets stored along with indexes and isn't queryable.""Its licensing needs to be improved. They don't offer a perpetual license. They want to know how many nodes you will be using, and they ask for an annual subscription. Otherwise, they don't give you permission to use it. Our customers are generally military or police departments or customers without connection to the internet. Therefore, this model is not suitable for us. This subscription-based model is not the best for OEM vendors. Another annoying thing about Elasticsearch is its roadmap. We are developing something, and then they say, "Okay. We have removed that feature in this release," and when we are adapting to that release, they say, "Okay. We have removed that one as well." We don't know what they will remove in the next version. They are not looking for backward compatibility from the customers' perspective. They just remove a feature and say, "Okay. We've removed this one." In terms of new features, it should have an ODBC driver so that you can search and integrate this product with existing BI tools and reporting tools. Currently, you need to go for third parties, such as CData, in order to achieve this. ODBC driver is the most important feature required. Its Community Edition does not have security features. For example, you cannot authenticate with a username and password. It should have security features. They might have put it in the latest release.""The solution must provide AI integrations.""I don't see improvements at the moment. The current setup is working well for me, and I'm satisfied with it. Integrating with different platforms is also fine, and I'm not recommending any changes or enhancements right now.""There are challenges with performance management and scalability.""They should improve its documentation. Their official documentation is not very informative. They can also improve their technical support. They don't help you much with the customized stuff. They also need to add more visuals. Currently, they have line charts, bar charts, and things like that, and they can add more types of visuals. They should also improve the alerts. They are not very simple to use and are a bit complex. They could add more options to the alerting system.""Machine learning on search needs improvement."

More Elastic Search Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We are currently on a contract with Algolia for licensing and price."
  • More Algolia Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "ELK has been considered as an alternative to Splunk to reduce licensing costs."
  • "An X-Pack license is more affordable than Splunk."
  • "​The pricing and license model are clear: node-based model."
  • "This is a free, open source software (FOSS) tool, which means no cost on the front-end. There are no free lunches in this world though. Technical skill to implement and support are costly on the back-end with ELK, whether you train/hire internally or go for premium services from Elastic."
  • "We are using the free version and intend to upgrade."
  • "It can be expensive."
  • "This product is open-source and can be used free of charge."
  • "We are using the open-sourced version."
  • More Elastic Search Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Search as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: The Algolia solution really helped us to improve our conversion rate and click through rate.
    Top Answer:We are currently on a contract with Algolia for licensing and price.
    Top Answer:I think they could improve the analytics view. I think they can improve by increasing the number of the terms that are searched every day on our website. If they doubled to two thousand terms that are… more »
    Top Answer:Logsign provides us with the capability to execute multiple queries according to our requirements. The indexing is very high, making it effective for storing and retrieving logs. The real-time… more »
    Top Answer:I don't see improvements at the moment. The current setup is working well for me, and I'm satisfied with it. Integrating with different platforms is also fine, and I'm not recommending any changes or… more »
    Ranking
    7th
    out of 14 in Search as a Service
    Views
    877
    Comparisons
    685
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    701
    Rating
    8.5
    1st
    out of 14 in Search as a Service
    Views
    3,475
    Comparisons
    1,221
    Reviews
    27
    Average Words per Review
    507
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Amazon AWS CloudSearch logo
    Compared 37% of the time.
    Amazon Kendra logo
    Compared 30% of the time.
    Azure Search logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Solr logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Faiss logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    Milvus logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    Pinecone logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Azure Search logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Amazon Athena logo
    Compared 3% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Elastic Enterprise Search, Swiftype, Elastic Cloud
    Learn More
    Overview


    Algolia helps businesses across industries quickly create relevant, scalable, and lightning fast search and discovery experiences. Algolia’s mission is to make every search interaction meaningful and rewarding. Our hosted platform reduces the complexity of building relevant digital experiences. More than 7,500 companies like WW, Lacoste, Twitch, Medium and Stripe rely on Algolia’s enterprise-grade APIs to manage over 60 billion search queries a month.

    Founded in 2012, Algolia is backed by $74M in funding from Accel Partners, Alven Capital, Point Nine Capital and Storm Ventures. The team is headquartered in San Francisco with offices in Paris, London, New York, and Atlanta. To learn more, visit www.algolia.com.

    Elasticsearch is a prominent open-source search and analytics engine known for its scalability, reliability, and straightforward management. It's a favored choice among enterprises for real-time data search, analysis, and visualization. Open-source Elasticsearch is free, offering a comprehensive feature set and scalability. It allows full control over deployments but requires managing and maintaining the infrastructure. On the other hand, Elastic Cloud provides a managed service with features like automated provisioning, high availability, security, and global reach.

    Elasticsearch excels in handling time-sensitive data and complex search requirements across large datasets. Its scalability allows it to handle growing data volumes efficiently, maintaining high performance and fast response times. Integrated with Kibana, Elasticsearch enables powerful data visualization, providing real-time insights crucial for data-driven decision-making.

    Elastic Cloud reduces operational overhead and improves scalability and performance, though it comes with associated costs. It is available on your preferred cloud provider — AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud. Customers who want to manage the software themselves, whether on public, private, or hybrid cloud, can download the Elastic Stack.

    At its core, Elasticsearch is renowned for its full-text search capabilities, capable of performing complex queries and supporting features like fuzzy matching and auto-complete.

    Peer reviews from various professionals highlight its strengths and weaknesses. Pros include its detection and correlation features, flexibility, cloud-readiness, extensibility, and efficient search capabilities. However, users have noted challenges like steep learning curves, data analysis limitations, and integration complexities. The platform is generally viewed as stable and scalable, with varying degrees of satisfaction regarding its usability and feature set.

    In summary, Elasticsearch stands out for its high-speed search, scalability, and versatile analytics, making it a go-to solution for organizations managing large datasets. Its adaptability to different enterprise needs, robust community support, and continuous development keep it at the forefront of enterprise search and analytics solutions. However, potential users should be aware of its learning curve and the need for skilled personnel for optimization.

    Sample Customers
    Birchbox, Twitch, Lacoste, Stripe, WW, Medium, Cousera, National Geographic, Zendesk, Magento
    T-Mobile, Adobe, Booking.com, BMW, Telegraph Media Group, Cisco, Karbon, Deezer, NORBr, Labelbox, Fingerprint, Relativity, NHS Hospital, Met Office, Proximus, Go1, Mentat, Bluestone Analytics, Humanz, Hutch, Auchan, Sitecore, Linklaters, Socren, Infotrack, Pfizer, Engadget, Airbus, Grab, Vimeo, Ticketmaster, Asana, Twilio, Blizzard, Comcast, RWE and many others.
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Computer Software Company27%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Insurance Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise50%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise62%
    Buyer's Guide
    Search as a Service
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft and others in Search as a Service. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Algolia is ranked 7th in Search as a Service with 2 reviews while Elastic Search is ranked 1st in Search as a Service with 59 reviews. Algolia is rated 8.6, while Elastic Search is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Algolia writes "Documentation is the best part and worth the money if the search is the core feature of your product". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Elastic Search writes "Played a crucial role in enhancing our cybersecurity efforts ". Algolia is most compared with Amazon AWS CloudSearch, Amazon Kendra, Azure Search and Solr, whereas Elastic Search is most compared with Faiss, Milvus, Pinecone, Azure Search and Amazon Athena.

    See our list of best Search as a Service vendors.

    We monitor all Search as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.