We performed a comparison between Amazon AWS and SAP S4HANA on AWS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like the auto-scaling functionality and compliance requirements, whichever they are requesting."
"IaaS with easy management and rapid implementation using Python Django Mezzanine."
"It's easy to manage. We can use a wide range of technologies with AWS."
"The most valuable feature is the availability, as we work in different availability zones."
"We write a lot of Lambda functions for various services, as well as serverless functions."
"The compute and the elasticness of the compute is really great. Whenever there's a load, it automatically adds the servers and then reduces the servers based on the configuration. This is really wonderful, more cost-effective, and it's been really good for us."
"I like S3, load balancers, and Route 53."
"This solution is stable and reliable."
"The tool's installation is easy. I rate it an eight out of ten."
"Provides good performance and regular release of new features."
"I would rate this solution as a nine out of ten because it covers all the fields, has a big maturity, and has something other solutions are missing, which is speed."
"Reporting transparency and user-friendliness are the key benefit of deploying SAP S4HANA on AWS. Furthermore, the solution offers a plethora of modules that have proven to be valuable, and there are regular updates available."
"The system has the capacity to manage all these departments in a single box and they're all integrated."
"The most valuable feature of SAP S4HANA on AWS is that when developed on a new structured system it can be configured."
"It's easy to use and user-friendly."
"SAP S4HANA's most valuable features include backup, security, storage, infrastructure, and enabling AI."
"Many of our clients prefer in-house cloud rather than the application data sitting in the infrastructure owned and managed by Amazon."
"The difficulty of the implementation depends on the project. We have a lot of very complicated and complex project which make the implementation more difficult. However, a small project can be very simple to implement. In general, over 90% of the project tend to be complex implementations."
"The customization could improve. However, it depends on the customization needed."
"I'd love to see an Amazon data center here in Peru."
"The AWS documentation is written in a way that is not very intuitive. That's an area they can improve."
"Some features may be better in Azure or some other portal. AWS could add some of those features."
"The security right now needs improvement. It's not bad, per se. It's just that there's always room for improvement in security."
"They currently have fewer regions in Asia, especially in India, China, and other places. They can maybe put more data centers in this region."
"I would like to see a lower price for the solution."
"The pricing is a little bit high."
"If you go to AWS's site they offer training programs that are very good. SAP does not do the same, if SAP could provide some training that would be great."
"The solution is costlier than other products."
"SAP S4HANA on AWS could improve by having the entire solution available as a web solution. They only have Fiori right now, and it's a solution for certain modules, but not for all the modules that SAP currently has. We would like to see the GUI removed, it is not very good. We want it to be web-based."
"This solution is very resource-intensive, including high memory and CPU utilization."
"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a three out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy."
"The AI aspect of SAP S4HANA can be improved."
Amazon AWS is ranked 2nd in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 250 reviews while SAP S4HANA on AWS is ranked 7th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 35 reviews. Amazon AWS is rated 8.4, while SAP S4HANA on AWS is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon AWS writes "Reliable with good security but is difficult to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S4HANA on AWS writes "With good documentation in place, the solution offers good technical support to its users". Amazon AWS is most compared with Linode, OpenShift, Microsoft Azure, SAP Cloud Platform and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), whereas SAP S4HANA on AWS is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and Alibaba Cloud. See our Amazon AWS vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS report.
See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.